Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:17:36 +0200 |
"Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero@lanchile.cl> writes:
I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Name One Web Site Compromised by Download.Ject?, Morning Wood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Laurent LEVIER |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Otero, Hernan (EDS) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Ben Nelson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |