Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:34:53 -0700 |
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 01:46:30PM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote:
On Tue, June 29, 2004 11:59 am, James Patterson Wicks said:CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use.Easy to use in a "Microsoft" kind of way. Last I heard, it does nice things for you like always allow DNS traffic through, even if you have no port 53 rule and a deny all policy. How helpful!
Sounds like somebody needs to learn how to run FW-1. There's several "implied" rules which are set from Global Properties, and are only displayed/logged if you specity to display/log implied rules. John
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Gary E. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Eric Paynter |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Gary E. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Eric Paynter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |