Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:59:22 -0400 |
Three letters . . . PDM The Pix Device Manager is painful to work with. CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Darkslaker Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:24 PM To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint i am studying for the CCSA and my Friend for CSPFA in the interchange of ideas we did not find differences significant; maybe two ; PIX run in OS for CISCO and CheckPoint in many platforms; and checkPoit have more products. My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why. "Yo nací para atrapar dragones en sus guaridas y para recoger flores. Yo nací para pasar las mañanas contando historias divertidas, para soñar a la deriva como si fuera yo un arroyo y para caminar descalzo a la luz del sol" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html This e-mail is the property of Oxygen Media, LLC. It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by sending an e-mail to postmaster@oxygen.com and destroy all electronic and paper copies of this e-mail.
| Previous by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] SUPER SPOOF DELUXE : Take Two, http-equiv@excite.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Perrymon, Josh L. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, John Kinsella |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Eric Paynter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |