Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Full-Disclosure] [ GLSA 200406-21 ] mit-krb5: Multiple buffer overflows in krb5_aname_to_localname |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:23:42 +0000 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200406-21
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Severity: High
Title: mit-krb5: Multiple buffer overflows in
krb5_aname_to_localname
Date: June 29, 2004
Bugs: #52744
ID: 200406-21
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Synopsis
========
mit-krb5 contains multiple buffer overflows in the function
krb5_aname_to_localname(). This could potentially lead to a complete
remote system compromise.
Background
==========
mit-krb5 is the free implementation of the Kerberos network
authentication protocol by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Affected packages
=================
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 app-crypt/mit-krb5 <= 1.3.3 >= 1.3.3-r1
Description
===========
The library function krb5_aname_to_localname() contains multiple buffer
overflows. This is only exploitable if explicit mapping or rules-based
mapping is enabled. These are not enabled as default.
With explicit mapping enabled, an attacker must authenticate using a
principal name listed in the explicit mapping list.
With rules-based mapping enabled, an attacker must first be able to
create arbitrary principal names either in the local realm Kerberos
realm or in a remote realm from which the local realm's service are
reachable by cross-realm authentication.
Impact
======
An attacker could use these vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code
with the permissions of the user running mit-krb5, which could be the
root user.
Workaround
==========
There is no known workaround at this time. All users are encouraged to
upgrade to the latest available version.
Resolution
==========
mit-krb5 users should upgrade to the latest version:
# emerge sync
# emerge -pv ">=app-crypt/mit-krb5-1.3.3-r1"
# emerge ">=app-crypt/mit-krb5-1.3.3-r1"
References
==========
[ 1 ] CAN-2004-0523
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0523
[ 2 ] MIT krb5 Security Advisory
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2004-001-an_to_ln.txt
Availability
============
This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
the Gentoo Security Website:
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200406-21.xml
Concerns?
=========
Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
confidentiality and security of our users machines is of utmost
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at
http://bugs.gentoo.org.
License
=======
Copyright 2004 Gentoo Technologies, Inc; referenced text
belongs to its owner(s).
The contents of this document are licensed under the
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0
pgplrqgVr7Qad.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SUPER SPOOF DELUXE Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft and Security, Eric Paynter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] SSH vs. TLS, Ng, Kenneth (US) |
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] SSH vs. TLS, dante |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Darkslaker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |