Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 06:13:51 -0700 |
Ok. It seems the case described. A spoofed packet with your IP as the source tries to connect to the compromised machine to port 80 at localhost. The compromised machine doesn't have a webserver listening at 127.0.0.1:80 so the tcp stack replyes ACK RST and sends this packet to your spoofed address.
Unlikely. If this were the case, the server would reply with RST, not RST, ACK. There's too little information to come to any conclusion at this point.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] [FLSA-2004:1207] Updated cvs resolves security vulnerability, Jesse Keating |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] Re: Bypassing "smart" IDSes with misdirected frames? (long and boring), Jim Bauer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?, Skip Duckwall |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?, full-disclosure |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |