Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 27 May 2004 20:07:22 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Mike Klinke wrote: [...]
Even the OP didn't mentioned this. I'm proned to believe those packets have 127.0.0.1 as the source of the packets.You're correct. I thought I'd sent this to the list last night but didn't watch the to: field carefully enough on my reply. I don't know the mechanism but I think I know what you were seeing. Here is an ethereal packet capture from the time. We, too, were constantly seeing our ISP controlled perimeter router sending these packets to our internal equipment. The source MAC address here is the perimeter router (Cisco 1700) and the ISP was pretty much stumped over the cause.
[...]
Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1), Dst Addr: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) Time to live: 121 Protocol: TCP (0x06) Src Port: 80 (80), Dst Port: 1319 (1319), Seq: 0, Ack: 986251265, Len: 0 Source port: 80 (80) Destination port: 1319 (1319) Flags: 0x0014 (RST, ACK)
Ok. It seems the case described. A spoofed packet with your IP as the source tries to connect to the compromised machine to port 80 at localhost. The compromised machine doesn't have a webserver listening at 127.0.0.1:80 so the tcp stack replyes ACK RST and sends this packet to your spoofed address.
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco's stolen code, Seth Alan Woolley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] Imaging Operating Systems, Williams Jon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?, Mike Klinke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?, Valentino Squilloni - Ouz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |