Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] SMTP Encryption (S/MIME) for Outlook question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:20:48 +0200 |
Greetings! On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:39:59 -0800 "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@comcast.net> wrote:
Most email clients are pretty easy to use with respect to S/MIME... Once you get the certificates installed. PKI. Managing certificates for a decent-sized luser base is not fun.
And from our experience S/MIME standards are just standard within the same product family. Outlook's S/MIME and Netscape's S/MIME won't work together the last time we tried.
What do other Win/Exchange/Outlook IT admins use for S/MIME?
GnuPG (OpenPGP standard) ?
BTW, if there's something that will run on top of the SMTP gateway server or the internal Exchange server to encrypt the message before being routed to the Internet, this is also acceptable.
A number of gateway servers. There is (was?) a software package from the GnuPG group. There is the T/Bone gateway (at freshmeat - and from http://www.bonelabs.com/). Utimaco has a crypto-gateway, too. Usually you'll want a single company-wide key when using a gateway to ensure confidential mail across the internet. This way you'll have plaintext emails via LAN though - if not using TLS. Bye Volker Tanger ITK Security
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] Panda 'phishing'?, Random Letters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Panda 'phishing'?, Johan Denoyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] SMTP Encryption (S/MIME) for Outlook question, Lionel Ferette |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] Re: SMTP Encryption (S/MIME) for Outlook question, i.t Consulting |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |