Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: AV Testing |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:58:26 -0500 |
http://www.itpro.co.uk/security/labs/1/enterprise-anti-virus-software/produc ts.html Reviews quite a few on your list. As far as McAfee goes, I've always had serious problems with not only their tech support but in the installation and most importantly uninstalling their software. You run into some of these problems with Symantec but not on the same scale and I've always had excellent tech support from them. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Evan Mann Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:56 AM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: AV Testing I have not tested or used F-Secure, NOD32, ESET, or Kaspersky. I don't hear those names come up to frequently in medium-to-large enterprise deployments. My environment is very similar to yours in size. I have used extensively Symantec over many versions, and have since switched to McAfee after testing Trend Micro OfficeScan and McAfee to determine my new AV vendor of choice. I found Trend and McAfee to be pretty similar all around when it came to impact on systems/network, but McAfee has a more robust management product with ePolicy Orchestrator. You can get an Anti-Spyware add-on module that installs as a plugin, and with the recent release of v8.5i, it does an extremely good job IMO. McAfee's biggest downfall is their support, but I haven't had to use it for anything critical. That being said, I do not like McAfee GroupShield, and opted to get Trend Micro's ScanMail product for Exchange, which I am very pleased with. I actually liked the Symantec Mail Security product for Exchange a lot as well, but in the newer versions, they started to dumb down the configuration options which turned me off from it. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Richard Whitworth Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:43 AM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: AV Testing Hi, I am in the process of evaluating software from various AV vendors to roll out across my organisation. The product will be installed on up to 1500 desktops/laptops, around 100 servers including Exchange and ISA proxies. As part of the process I want to measure the impact of the software on key systems and services. Has anyone gone through this process before and if so can you provide any tips or testing ideas? For Exchange database aware AV I was considering using the Exchange Load Generator utility from MS, however I am not sure how accurately this will generate loading on the AV software. I am going to be evaluating F-Secure, NOD32 from ESET, Kaspersky and McAfee's Enterprise solution. What have people's experiences been with these products - any good/bad experiences to be aware of? TIA, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetec t ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: AV Testing, Evan Mann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Removing traces of the Mytob worm?, techgrl |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: AV Testing, Evan Mann |
| Next by Thread: | Removing traces of the Mytob worm?, techgrl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |