Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:25:03 -0400 |
I read about a year and a half ago that there were over 30 million known pieces of spyware of which over 5 million were active executables. Given the fact that many of the worms slithering across the net out there have "call home, self updating capabilities" there will never be a comprehensive signature based antispyware that catches even 10% of the threats. We need to get out of reactive mode and go proactive, and blah, blah, blah. It is not at all surprising that MS avoids certain spyware. After all, when you install MS operating systems out of the box you get Alexa before you connect to any network. -B- -----Original Message----- From: Quark IT - Hilton Travis [mailto:Hilton@quarkit.com.au] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 4:51 PM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind Hi All, It seems that not only does Microsoft AntiSpyware recommend that Claria's spyware is ignored, but it also misses a significant amount of cookies that are placed on a system - I have a VPC environment where I browse the Internet so that anywhere I go won't affect my regular Windows session/installation. Regularly CounterSpy is detecting cookies (such as Cok.ad.yieldmanager, CGI-Bin, Cok.AssassinTrojan2.0 and Zedo (from yesterday's browsing)) that Microsoft AntiSpyware simply does not know about. Now, this is not only disappointing, but potentially dangerous. Any customer or end user running Microsoft AntiSpyware or CounterSpy is not being protected from these cookies, and MSAS doesn't even detect them - that's right, neither program's active monitoring is stopping the installation of these cookies, but at least CounterSpy is detecting them post-installation. AntiSpyware is far, far from the accuracy of antivirus, especially something like NOD32. I wonder how long it will be before a decent AntiSpyware application is released that, like NOD32 does with viruses, actually stops spyware *before* it is installed? -- Regards, Hilton Travis Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889 (Brisbane, Australia) Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394 Manager, Quark IT http://www.quarkit.com.au Quark Group http://quarkgroup.com.au/ Microsoft Small Business Specialists http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks War doesn't determine who is right. War determines who is left. This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient only. It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material which must not be disclosed or distributed.
| Previous by Date: | CFP: The First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (AReS 2006), 20-22 April, 2006, Vienna, Austria, Manh Tho |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind, Duston Sickler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind, Valdis Shkesters |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind, Bruce Klein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |