Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: AV that supoprts spy/adware |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 6 May 2005 12:34:17 +0300 |
It does sound pretty promising, but what is the reality? Have you read the ICSA Labs test report? I did. By the way, it is available here: http://www.icsalabs.com/services/lab_reports/Panda_Public_Evaluation.PDF
The behaviour-blocking components mainly are used to detect new and unknown malicious code, and they complement the traditional signature solution. After having read the ICSA Labs test report, I was rather surprised (and disappointed by this testing group) that they have used long-known malicious programs to test the TruPrevent's blocking abilities. ICSA Labs lists the viruses they have used: Sircam, Nimda, PrettyPark, Klez et cetera. It's all old stuff and classics of computer virus history. All malicious programs listed in the test report had been known long before this test took place and some of them - even before the TruPrevent had been developed.
As a matter of fact, the virus defence components without signatures also are updated when new threats emerge. Therefore, it's not clear why a product developed for protection mainly from new malicious code was tested on the old one. The only aim of doing this might be to prove that it works at all.
I encourage you to read this (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1727662,00.asp). It looks more realistic: TruPrevent detects 2/3 of new malicious programs. This is closer to my own experience. Interestingly, the best signature scanners for detecting malicious code almost provide this rate (Retrospective/ProActive Test, November 2004, http://www.av-comparatives.org).
Best regards,
Valdis Shkesters
Panda Software has a bundled solution as well. Actually they use a technology called TruPrevent that uses a behavioral approach to defend against malware in general. Here is a link to a review I just read -- sounds promising.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1808169,00.asp
------------------------------------------------
Roger Padilla, Jr.
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA
ITS/PS3
Network Analyst
Office: (805) 756-5294
Email: mailto:ropadill@calpoly.edu
------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: Dave [mailto:wintermutecx@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:00 AM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: AV that supoprts spy/adware
Anyone have a list of AV that detects spyware? We are currently using eTrust
with spybot and the MS beta antispyware. I'd like to get something that's
integrated. Thanks.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: AV that supoprts spy/adware, Matti Haack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: AV that supoprts spy/adware, David Philpotts |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: AV that supoprts spy/adware, Roger Padilla Jr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: AV that supoprts spy/adware, Shane B. Milburn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |