Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | re: Potential Virus Problem |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:53:11 -0600 |
I work at a large University in the Infosec office. We have had a about a dozen new variants of S/D bot in our environment in the last 6 months. We find and send the malicious file(s) to McAfee and they send us an extra.dat file back which will find and remove the new bug. How to submit a file is published on their website. We usually get an extra.dat file back from them in a few hours, but it takes about a week for the new signature to be included in the regular update. This is longer than I would have thought. As I understand the source code for the S/D bot is published somewhere on the internet so it can be easily modified. McAfee would find any of them when they first appeared, but will find all 12 now. All of our S/D botted hosts were connecting out to an IRC site, so once we find the first one we can use the frontdoor FW logs the find the rest of the compromised boxes. One of our special SD bots was trying to connect to the a 10.x.x.x ip??? This seemed odd to me. The extra.dat McAfee sends will find and remove the bot. We alway recommend a full rebuild, but few techs or end user do this. Steve Earls wrote:
Some of our business units are experiencing problems
with a potential virus. We have searched the Web and
various AV sites without much luck. Can anyone shed
some light on the following symptoms?
The symptoms are:
4 files appear in the winnt\system32 folder.
ihotunib.exe, ikusefote.exe, rudim.exe and
imaxavos.exe. These executables imbed themselves into
the registry and kick off processes that inurn lock
out user accounts at other company locations.
Once these files are removed, it appears that a
rpc_svchost process kicks off and consumes 99% of the
available processor time. This renders the systems
un-useable.
W2k and XP systems are affected. The following seem to
hit pretty close but not dead-on.
· Win32/SdBot.45568!Worm (also known as:
Backdoor.Win32.SdBot.gen)
· Win32.Slinbot.ACT (also known as:
W32/Sdbot.worm.gen.j, Backdoor.Win32.SdBot.gen)
Steve
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
http://personals.yahoo.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Potential Virus Problem, Steve Earls |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | R: Potential Virus Problem, Lino Riccobono |
| Previous by Thread: | Potential Virus Problem, Steve Earls |
| Next by Thread: | R: Potential Virus Problem, Lino Riccobono |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |