Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [TH-research] Microsoft antivirus - is it beta? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:35:21 +0200 |
Hi All, Long time didn't contribute to the list, I think that your assessment is right and wrong :-) , you are viewing it from the wrong perspective. The only guys that actually care if product A removes registry keys or product B is looking for other keys are us! In my humble opinion there is no customer that will even understand what it is. The market drivers are mainly psychological, just got a survey that the majority of managers in the EU think that if they installed products by categories from a well known list (FW,AV,IDS,etc) all is ok, features is a detail. The survey added that 72% percent are afraid of losing their jobs if attacked, which brings us for covering their behinds. Microsoft has a brilliant technique of market penetration. 1. Establish presence - do you remember Netscape vs. IE 1.0 ?! 2. Give for free - media player, IE, AV, MSN ... 3. Cover all known and existing - they will not develop anything new 4. Make the product better. Ask yourself, Netscape who ? After some time, they are killing the market, no creativity, nothing. Back to the corporate manager or the consumer's way of thinking: 'I have AV, why should I buy a new one ?', the only customers that will be left are the advanced, which are a tiny fraction of the market. As I see it, it is not how good your product but rather your costumer's psychology is. Regards, -- Zak __________________________ Zak Dechovich, Managing Director SecureOL Ltd. Mobile: +972 54 21 20 555 Office: +972 2 675 1291 Fax: +972 2 678 3301 -----Original Message----- From: th-research-bounces@linuxbox.org [mailto:th-research-bounces@linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:04 PM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: [TH-research] Microsoft antivirus - is it beta? Some months back, Microsoft announced the purchase of an antivirus company. For those in malware research, this appeared to be an indicator that Microsoft would be getting back into the field. Apparently, very few of us are old enough to recall the first time Microsoft "produced" an antivirus product, but those who are remember that the kindest way to describe the attempt would be "not fully thought through." Therefore, we did not look forward to this event with any great enthusiasm. Subsequently, Microsoft announced it had acquired an anti-spyware company. Then it announced a beta test version of an anti-spyware product. Then there was a flurry of announcements about legalities, copyright infringements, products that would be free, settlements of copyright infringement suits, products that would be charged for, and so forth, so I hope I can be forgiven for not recalling exactly where in that timeline came the announcement of a beta version of an antivirus product. I viewed the antivirus beta with some trepidation. The announcement was not particularly clear about the capabilities of the product. It did indicate that the antivirus would be a) limited to specific malware programs, b) concentrate on "worms," and c) there seemed to be hints that the program would run in the background. With apprehension I downloaded the beta antivirus and installed it on one machine. Nothing happened. Nothing appeared in the Start menu programs list. Nothing appeared in the "Program Files" directory. Nothing appeared in the "Remove Programs" list. Nothing disappeared from my malware samples directory. Subsequently, I have been receiving announcements from "Auto Update" that the "Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool" was ready for installation. Previously I found this completely bewildering. In the latest instance, if you choose "Custom Install," it does inform you that the tool will run once, and then be deleted from your computer. This makes a bit more sense. According to Microsoft, more information for this update can be found at http://www.microsoft.com/malwareremove. This page states the same "run and then disappear" process, along with the assertion that the program will generate a report on the status of your computer. (So far, in my experience, this hasn't happened.) The page lists seventeen pieces of malware that the program "cleans." The mention of "background" operation now seems to be tied to the Auto Update process, although it isn't completely clear that the antivirus itself doesn't run in the background. (The "run and delete" description would seem to indicate that the antivirus doesn't run in the background.) I am interested in results from any others who have studied the program in more detail, including issues related to where the program looks for infections, what is cleaned, removal of malware from memory, cleanup of the Registry, scanning of mail files (many of the malware items listed are spread via email attachments), and so forth. ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) rslade@vcn.bc.ca slade@victoria.tc.ca rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu Press any key to continue. NO, NO, NOT *THAT* ONE! http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade _______________________________________________ TH-research, The Trojan Horses Research mailing list Home page: http://ecompute.org/th-list https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/th-research
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [cisspforum] Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?, Bond, William D |
| Previous by Thread: | Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [cisspforum] Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?, Bond, William D |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |