Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Virus
[Top] [All Lists]

Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?

Subject: Microsoft antivirus - is it beta?
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:03:39 -0800
Some months back, Microsoft announced the purchase of an antivirus company.  
For those in malware research, this appeared to be an indicator that Microsoft 
would be getting back into the field.  Apparently, very few of us are old 
enough to 
recall the first time Microsoft "produced" an antivirus product, but those who 
are 
remember that the kindest way to describe the attempt would be "not fully 
thought through."  Therefore, we did not look forward to this event with any 
great enthusiasm.

Subsequently, Microsoft announced it had acquired an anti-spyware company.  
Then it announced a beta test version of an anti-spyware product.  Then there 
was 
a flurry of announcements about legalities, copyright infringements, products 
that 
would be free, settlements of copyright infringement suits, products that would 
be 
charged for, and so forth, so I hope I can be forgiven for not recalling 
exactly 
where in that timeline came the announcement of a beta version of an antivirus 
product.

I viewed the antivirus beta with some trepidation.  The announcement was not 
particularly clear about the capabilities of the product.  It did indicate that 
the 
antivirus would be a) limited to specific malware programs, b) concentrate on 
"worms," and c) there seemed to be hints that the program would run in the 
background.  With apprehension I downloaded the beta antivirus and installed it 
on 
one machine.

Nothing happened.

Nothing appeared in the Start menu programs list.  Nothing appeared in the 
"Program Files" directory.  Nothing appeared in the "Remove Programs" list.  
Nothing disappeared from my malware samples directory.

Subsequently, I have been receiving announcements from "Auto Update" that the 
"Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool" was ready for installation.  
Previously I found this completely bewildering.  In the latest instance, if you 
choose "Custom Install," it does inform you that the tool will run once, and 
then 
be deleted from your computer.  This makes a bit more sense.

According to Microsoft, more information for this update can be found at 
http://www.microsoft.com/malwareremove.  This page states the same "run and 
then disappear" process, along with the assertion that the program will 
generate a 
report on the status of your computer.  (So far, in my experience, this hasn't 
happened.)

The page lists seventeen pieces of malware that the program "cleans."  The 
mention of "background" operation now seems to be tied to the Auto Update 
process, although it isn't completely clear that the antivirus itself doesn't 
run in 
the background.  (The "run and delete" description would seem to indicate that 
the 
antivirus doesn't run in the background.)

I am interested in results from any others who have studied the program in more 
detail, including issues related to where the program looks for infections, 
what is 
cleaned, removal of malware from memory, cleanup of the Registry, scanning of 
mail files (many of the malware items listed are spread via email attachments), 
and so forth.

======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@vcn.bc.ca      slade@victoria.tc.ca      rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu
Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to
err. It passes my comprehension how human beings, be they ever so
experienced and able, can delight in depriving other human beings
of that precious right.                - Mahatma Gandhi, (1869-1948)
http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev    or    http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>