Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:59:50 -0500 |
Hello Rodrigo, Glad you were able to apply a "band-aid" to get it under control temporarily.
My question is, what do you think is the best procedure to track down the executables responsible for this behavior? After tracking them down, I could submit the sample to several online scanners in order to determine which specific malware is affecting the PCs. It it were UNIX, I could use commands like socklist and netstat to track down the malware processes. But in Windows XP, I don't know what to use. Are there any built-in utilities? Some freeware stuff? All help is welcome.
A useful program for Windows is freeware from Foundstone called Fport: - http://www.foundstone.com/resources/proddesc/fport.htm Once you've narrowed down the EXEs, you could submit it to a place like VirusTotal: - http://www.VirusTotal.com This will scan the EXEs with many different AV engines for known malware (even spyware/adware from some engines). They will also automatically send your malware sample to all engines used. (To disable this, click the "Distribute" icon next to the file submission line.) Nick FitzGerlad also put up a list some time ago of addresses to submit samples too. If any of these are out of date, please let me know and/or message the list with an update: Authentium (Command Antivirus) <virus@authentium.com> BitDefender <virus_submission@bitdefender.com> Computer Associates (US) <virus@ca.com> Computer Associates (Vet/EZ) <ipevirus@vet.com.au> DialogueScience (Dr. Web) <Antivir@dials.ru> Eset (NOD32) <sample@nod32.com> F-Secure Corp. <samples@f-secure.com> Frisk Software (F-PROT) <viruslab@f-prot.com> Grisoft (AVG) <virus@grisoft.cz> H+BEDV (AntiVir, Vexira engine) <virus@antivir.de> Kaspersky Labs <newvirus@kaspersky.com> Network Associates (McAfee) <virus_research@nai.com> (use a ZIP file with the password 'infected' without the quotes) Norman (NVC) <analysis@norman.no> Panda Software <labs@pandasoftware.com> Sophos Plc. <support@sophos.com> Symantec (Norton) <avsubmit@symantec.com> Trend Micro (PC-cillin) <virus_doctor@trendmicro.com> (Trend may only accept files from users of its products) NOTE: Resending this to the list - Mark Fossi caught a small snafu that has now been fixed with the email addresses. He also informed me of BitDefender's address, which has been added to the list above. Resending to Rodrigo as well to help avoid confuson. =) HTH! -- Peace. ~G On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:50:55 +0000, Rodrigo Ventura <yoda@isr.ist.utl.pt> wrote:
I have a couple of PCs (running XP) which I'm sure are infected with some kind of malware. Common anti-virus such as OfficeScan and Symantec do not detect them. They seem to be irc bots. They try to connect to IRC servers, using a password, and receive from there instructions on what to do, namely scan for LSASS vulnerabilities by scanning the entire IP subnet in random. I sniffed the IRC servers IPs and passwords, and confirmed my suspicions, after entering in those IRC servers (and being banned as soon as detected by the admins). Moreover, they open backdoors, which accoriding to the kind of responses to a telnet, seem spam relayers, or FTP servers (not sure which). (My response to this threat was to block the IPs of the suspicious IRC servers in the firewall. This calmed down the packet storms I've been watching...) My question is, what do you think is the best procedure to track down the executables responsible for this behavior? After tracking them down, I could submit the sample to several online scanners in order to determine which specific malware is affecting the PCs. It it were UNIX, I could use commands like socklist and netstat to track down the malware processes. But in Windows XP, I don't know what to use. Are there any built-in utilities? Some freeware stuff? All help is welcome. And regarding the IRC server IPs, is it worthwhile to report them to the authorities specified in the whois databases? Cheers, Rodrigo -- *** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda@isr.ist.utl.pt> *** Web page: http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda *** Teaching Assistant and PhD Student at ISR: *** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa *** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, PORTUGAL *** PGP fingerprint = 0119 AD13 9EEE 264A 3F10 31D3 89B3 C6C4 60C6 4585
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc?, John Barton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc?, Rich Gardner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc?, Rich Gardner |
| Next by Thread: | RE: what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc?, Roger Padilla Jr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |