Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: System Spy -- Key Logger |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:04:31 -0600 |
Several Keylogger files use the .dat format so the user wont be suspicious of this files in his sistem. This files are later sent to the intruder via mail. I you open the file with notepad you get all the keystrokes. -----Original Message----- From: Brunner, Mark [mailto:MBrunner@tor.fasken.com] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 7:41 AM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: System Spy -- Key Logger The online description at Pest Patrol states: * Captured data is stored encrypted, in dated files (ex. '01.20.99.DAT') and can be deleted through System Spy interface. This is probably what is causing the false positive. I have performed a scan on a system that has been freshly imaged. You will have a fair number of .DAT files on every standard Windows system. Pretty ineffective scan if it relies on file names only and doesn't try to validate content. Pretty effective marketing tool if your target audience is the average home user... Mark Brunner Security Manager Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP This communication is solicitor/client privileged and contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other distribution of this communication or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to anyone. -----Original Message----- From: David Wright [mailto:dkwsecurity@nelmezzo.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:40 AM To: focus-virus@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: System Spy -- Key Logger On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Roger Padilla Jr wrote:
All,
I was wondering if anyone has some information on a particular
piece of spyware called "System Spy -- Key Logger". It is not
detected by either Ad-aware or Spybot -- it is being identified by
Pest Patrol's free online scanner. I have tried numerous searches to
isolate the nature of the payload and delivery mechanism. There are a
number of Spyware companies that do have it registered in their threat
databases, and they all classify System Spy as a key logger. So far
my research has typically resolved to gambling sites and a number of
Spying software programs that can be purchased or downloaded. There
are at least three computers I have come across that have been
identified as having this particular spyware. Any help would be
appreciated.
Your post piqued my interest, so I ran PestScan myself. I got quite a few false positives. I combed through the results and it seems to me that PestScan will give a positive when it finds a file of the same name as a file used by a piece of spyware. For example, I got a positive for System Spy, too. The only thing I could find on my system that matched with Pest Patrol's descriptive data for this spyware was under "File Analyses". The file name was setup.inf. It's not surprising that I had a file of this name on my system. And it wasn't the System Spy file. Can anyone help to confirm this "false positive by file name only" scenario? Thanks! -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Where to Deploy Trend Micro viruswall?, Invalid Addr3ss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Where to Deploy Trend Micro viruswall?, bugtraq |
| Previous by Thread: | Where to Deploy Trend Micro viruswall?, Invalid Addr3ss |
| Next by Thread: | what is the best procedure to track down a potentially new virus/worm/etc?, Rodrigo Ventura |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |