Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Shutdown from NT-AUTHORITY\... = virus/attack? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:55:12 -0500 |
Sadly I think it is you who has overlooked the obvious. The intent of my post was not because i did not believe there was spyware on the machine. I am well aware of this machines infection. What I am concerned with is the NT authority shutdown error I receive even though there is no known RPC exploiting virus on the system and it is not attached to a network right now to receive the exploit of any existing viruses on the network. To my knowledge no spyware exploits this vulnerability, and no virus that does is on, or is capable of getting on, this system right now. With this in mind does anyone have any ideas as to the source of this shutdown message and/or have experience with such a situation? Hijackthis logs will be available soon. Regards, Larry Support Services www.IVNET.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James E. Bunting" <jimbunting@msn.com> To: <lists@e-lsd.com>; <focus-virus@securityfocus.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Shutdown from NT-AUTHORITY\... = virus/attack?
Larry, I think that you overlooked the obvious, specifically the lack of Spyware protections (the Ad-Ware issue is certainly a viable clue in this case). AdWare or Spyware isn't necessarily obtained via the Internet alone, as
any
AdWare/ Spyware infected platform that communicates even once with this XP Laptop could be the source of infection. Previously, I worked in a somewhat similar 'standalone' Windows XP Laptop environment (I used 'always-on' Broadband in a SOHO environment, but I routinely disconnected when finished with an Internet session/service due
to
LAN/WAN connectivity elsewhere - basically I treated Broadband as a high-speed Dial-up connection via a SOHO). Even with technical Anti-Virus experience, I was totally amazed with the growth ramifications of Spyware when I initially installed these services several years ago. These Spyware services immediately identified more than 200+ Spyware instances, from various Spyware infections. And that was when there were only a few thousand Spyware signatures. Today I am protected from almost 30 thousand Spyware signatures as identified by the Webroot Spysweeper application. Spyware is a serious threat to the Internet experience, regardless of the rarity of an Internet connection - Once infected your platform stays infected unless you take
the
appropiate steps to disinfect the software. Webroot provides a free 'Demo' of their Spysweeper application (with a limited signature capability), and I sincerely suggest that you use this opportunity to disinfect your standalone XP Laptop of potential AdWare/Spyware signatures. Should this software resolve your problems, I highly recommend that you consider upgrading your existing Anti-Virus configuration to include Spyware protection, or obtain an additional
Spyware
application. In my honest personal opinion, Symantec and other Anti-virus services
would
not have added additional Spyware services in the past year or so, if
these
exploding Spyware infections were not negatively impacting their existing Anti-Virus product lines. In the recent past we have observed the creation and growth of 'Personal' Firewall Services, 'Personal' Intrusion Detection Services (HIDS), 'Personal' Intrusion Prevention Services (HIPS), along with URL Screening and AdWareSpyware services (not to mention true enterprise level content filtering). Thus it is no longer sufficient to rely upon an Anti-Virus applications as a sole method of prevention for an infected software platform. Regardless of your experience with software infections, there are many categories of infection that are not revealed by Anti-Virus solutions. Sincerely, James E. Bunting jimbunting@msn.comFrom: "Larry Mitchell" <lists@e-lsd.com> To: <focus-virus@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Shutdown from NT-AUTHORITY\... = virus/attack? Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:17:28 -0500 Greetings to All, I have an interesting twist on this little story here that may interest some of you. Details of the situation are as follows: The box is a laptop running XP home with SP1. The box is known to be infected with spyware. The box is know to be free of viruses and other malware. The box receives an NT authority shutdown with a 60 second timer not 30 from the RPC service. Seems normal right? Well here comes the twist. The box is not on a network. The box is not dialed in to the internet. The box shows no signs of blaster or sasser. The issue is reproducable by simply running ad-aware SE Any ideas? Larry Support Services www.IVNET.com_________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Shutdown from NT-AUTHORITY\... = virus/attack?, Larry Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Virus list by ports used, travis . alexander |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Shutdown from NT-AUTHORITY\... = virus/attack?, James E. Bunting |
| Next by Thread: | remotely took over computer, nguyen khoa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |