Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: (mis)using RBAC... |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:43:23 -0400 |
Jonathan,
My questions are, is this a normal practice (are there other people doing it) and is it supported? What unintended consequences am I
This is what RBAC was designed for. Yes, it is supported and is widely used by many of Sun's customers.
missing? I understand that if a user's account is compromised, the webserver services can be stopped and started at-will. I also
This is why many organizations prefer to assign authorizations and rights profiles to Solaris roles. roles are the same as regular users except that they are not permitted to log directly into the system (either remotely or from the console). You can only "su" to a role. Attempts to do so are audited and will result in a message like:
# telnet localhost Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. login: webadm Password: Roles can only be assumed by authorized users Login incorrect Connection to localhost closed by foreign host.
By placing your authorizations and rights profiles into a role, then the user must first authenticate to the role before being allowed to use the privileges assigned to that role.
Further, roles can only be assumed (via su(1M)) by authorized users as the message above suggests. This means that you could assign your web server administrators to a role like webadm and no other user could attempt to assume that role. Attempts to do so would yield a message like:
$ id -a uid=105(joe) gid=1(other) groups=1(other)
$ roles roleA
$ getent passwd roleB roleB:x:108:1::/export/home/roleB:/bin/pfsh
$ su roleB Password: Roles can only be assumed by authorized users su: Sorry
In this case, user "joe" was permitted to assume "roleA" but not "roleB".
understand that our sysadmin group will be restricted to using pfcsh/pfksh/pfsh and cannot use bash or tcsh (although we can still leave those set, type 'exec pfsh' and then do what we need to do as the Profile.)
By default, roles are created with a profile shell (pfsh). You do not need to use profile shells however in order to execute commands with privilege. You can use the pfexec(1) command if you like. For example:
$ id -a uid=106(john) gid=1(other) groups=1(other) $ profiles -l
Crypto Management:
/usr/sbin/cryptoadm euid=0
/usr/sfw/bin/CA.pl euid=0
/usr/sfw/bin/openssl euid=0
All:
*
$ /usr/sbin/cryptoadm stop
cryptoadm: failed to stop cryptographic framework daemon - Not owner.$ pfexec /usr/sbin/cryptoadm stop $ pfexec /usr/sbin/cryptoadm start
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.
g
-- Glenn M. Brunette, Jr. Distinguished Engineer, Chief Security Architect Client Solutions, Global Data Center Practice CTO Sun Microsystems, Inc.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: (mis)using RBAC..., Darren J Moffat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: (mis)using RBAC..., Glenn M. Brunette, Jr. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: (mis)using RBAC..., Darren J Moffat |
| Next by Thread: | RE: (mis)using RBAC..., Robert Archer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |