Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus

Subject: RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:58:23 -0000
Thor

I'm not sure I explained myself that well.

My theory is that if the Autorun.inf file is present, then the enumeration
process reads it and although it ignores the "open=" statement on media
marked as removable, it still processes the "icon=" statement - on my system
apparently regardless of whether autoplay is switched on or off.

A malformed .ICO file could conceivably cause the buffer overflow, and might
allow the situation to be taken advantage of - IE run arbitrary code on the
USB flashdisk.

It would not be the first time a buffer overflow was used to take advantage
of duff processing of a graphics file, remember the GDI+ vulnerability
MS04-028 that did similar with JPEG files in late 2004?

The JPEG GDI+ vuln depended upon the content of the comment field within the
JGPEG file (described here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=109524346729948&q=raw).

As the autorun "ico=" statement is also capable of pulling icons directly
out of an executable, it seems plenty possible to hijack it - provided the
buffer overflow is unchecked.
Cheers

James







-----Original Message-----
From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:thor@hammerofgod.com] 
Sent: 18 December 2006 17:11
To: James D. Stallard; Focus-MS
Subject: Re: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus

Hey James... inline:


On 12/15/06 5:07 PM, "James D. Stallard" <james@leafgrove.com> spoketh to
all:

Thor, et al

Question regarding autorun on USB flash disks (I never like the term
"thumbdrive"):

If you have a file in the root called "autorun.inf" and it contains a 
valid syntax for an icon file, the icon will appear as the drive icon 
in Windows Explorer. This most certainly works with XPSP2+patches.

Actually, you'll get a drive icon whether it has an autorun.inf or not...
That's just Windows identifying the device as a mountable drive.  The
autorun doesn't do anything... Even with it present (on my systems) it
doesn't even ask you to run it.
 
The OS is clearly executing something, just not your arbitrary code.

The question is, would it be possible to take advantage of the icon 
functionality (presumably within explorer.exe) to hijack the process 
and run your own code? I'm thinking buffer overflow as the most likely 
scenario, but I'm also thinking that following MS "trustworthy 
computing initiative" and XPSP2, the existence of buffer overflow 
possibilities in the OS is pretty minimal these days.

Well, that's the trick... Explorer.exe is just saying "This device mounted
as a drive letter, and here it is."  Yes, it's "running code" (Actually, I
would guess that the code is already running and that it just renums
available drives by type) but as you said, it's not running any code on the
device itself.  

Sure you could hijack the process, but that would mean that the OS was
already compromised in some way, or that you've already got code on the box
to do that (a rootkit could easily do this.  Well, "easily" if you know how
;).  But at that point, it's moot.  I don't see how you could do that with
any data that requires it be loaded from the device to then exploit some
vector, even if such vector exists.  But even if you could, and you really
wanted to go down that path, I think it would be easier to just get yourself
a U3 drive so that stuff like autorun would work by design.

t





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>