Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Whole disk encryption

Subject: Re: Whole disk encryption
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:33:30 +0200
Paul Giddens wrote:

GIVEN that, if you are concerned about security and want to use
encryption,
WHY would you choose to NOT do full disk?

From a functionality perspective the answer is simple: more encryption will cost more performance (unless the disk itself supports en/decryption in real time).
From a security perspective:
- because you might have a computer used by more than a single person
- because you might have a person using more than a single computer (and still wanting to be able to en/decrypt his data everywhere)
- because you might have a person who does neither own nor administer a computer and needs the ability to change the encryption keys herself


Pretty much like with transport vs. end-to-end encryption there are uses for both types of storage encryption. They might be completing each other in a security solution but will not be able to act as functional substitutes for each other.

Denis

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>