Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: DACLS for software distribution points...

Subject: RE: DACLS for software distribution points...
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:31:05 -0700
At Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:02 PM:, Murad Talukdar wrote:

Hi all,
MS says in this article that the DACLS for software distribution
points should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control,
Change, Read.  


http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/45a873dd-660d-4de
6-aa
c4-8a03974796121033.mspx?mfr=true

Why shouldn't the EVERYONE be removed and replaced with Authenticated
Users? 
I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any adverse impact.

It probably won't have any adverse impact, but do remember that in XP
and 2003 Everyone no longer allows anonymous access unless explicitly
permitted by Group Policy, so there is no effective difference.

-- 
Devin L. Ganger                    Email: deving@3sharp.com
3Sharp LLC                         Phone: 425.882.1032 x 109
15311 NE 90th Street                Cell: 425.239.2575
Redmond, WA  98052                   Fax: 425.702.8455
(e)Mail Insecurity: http://blogs.3sharp.com/blog/deving/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>