Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Internet security on "hotspots" |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:25:34 -0400 |
Whoops, one amendment- "Guest" (the built-in account, and only that one guest account) is part of "Users", IIRC, but not "Authenticated Users". Sorry about that. I haven't had my coffee today. :-) In any case, the URL I gave might still be useful. Laura
-----Original Message----- From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:larobins@bellatlantic.net] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:08 AM To: 'Trevor'; 'focus-ms@securityfocus.com' Subject: RE: Internet security on "hotspots" Authenticated Users and Everyone are not the same, and the difference between them has nothing to do with the Guest account or Guests/Domain Guests groups. In Windows 2000 and earlier, Everyone includes Anonymous Logon. In Win2K3, the Anonymous Logon account was removed from the Everyone group. Mixed-mode domains (Win2K) and Windows 2000 mixed functional level domains (Win2K3) have nothing whatsoever to do with the membership of the Everyone group. Mixed mode/FL relating to groups is about whether or not you can create universal security groups and fully utilize domain local groups. Last, the built-in Guest account is part of both Authenticated Users *and* Everyone. An old post I wrote so I don't have to type the details up again: http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/focus-ms/ 2003-01/0046.html Laura-----Original Message----- From: Trevor [mailto:trevor@rottdog.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 7:41 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Internet security on "hotspots" How about looking into using IPSec with a Pre-shared key (since the home user likely does not have a Cert Authority or AD)? That link does have a few misnomers. Using "AuthenticatedUsers" onshares over Everyone is only necessary in a mix-mode domain. Otherwise, AU and Everyone are the same (as 2000 removed Guest from the Everyone group). -Trevor -----Original Message----- From: ilaiy [mailto:ilaiy.e@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:03 AM To: nimda@retroweb.net Cc: Agent Zr0; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Internet security on "hotspots" Came across this checklist for home users which is pretty good .. [url] http://labmice.techtarget.com/articles/winxpsecuritychecklist.htm [/url] ./thanks ilaiy -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Internet security on "hotspots", Laura A. Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Internet security on "hotspots", mcclenbw |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Internet security on "hotspots", James Harless |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Internet security on "hotspots", David LeBlanc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |