Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Adding Users via Web Interface

Subject: Re: Adding Users via Web Interface
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:16:58 -0700
Your exactly right in the assumption for a secure method.  And my lack
of mentioning an AD infrastructure is because there isn't one.  I
understand the vulnerability involved in allowing LAN users to change
passwords via a web interface, but that is beside my original question. 
Thank you everyone thus far with the help!

Regards,

Adam Kane

mcclenbw@oneonta.edu wrote:
We aren't talking about anything new here.  The Exchange OWA connects to
AD and has a password change feaure. Although I'm not quite sure where
the orginal poster mentioned the existance of an AD infrastructure to
begin with.  Seems like that was just an assumption.

If anyone objects to the basis of the question, I'd be interested in
hearing different solutions to meet the  need, but you can't just call
it's frivolous.  I wish everytime my employer had a need to be met, I
could just say "Sorry, won't do it.  Sounds frivilous.", and they would
just go away.  I may get away with saying I wouldn't suugest doing it
that way, but the next question would, "how could we acheive it?" A lack
of a solution does not abolish a need.  

Also, it's safe to assume, I believe, that anyone posting to newsgroup
focused on Microsoft security is looking for a secure method to
implement.




  
-----Original Message-----
From: James Harless [mailto:jharless@kidwellcompanies.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:19 AM
To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Adding Users via Web Interface

Seems like an exceptionally bad idea to me.  Connecting a 
webserver to AD so frivolously seems like an invitation to evil-doing.


--
James Harless




On 4/11/06 7:24 PM, "Crawley, Jim" <Jim.Crawley@yrbrands.com> wrote:

    
I'm actually quite interested in seeing how this progresses as
well.  Right now we have a mixed network and it would be 
      
great to have a
    
way for the end-user to change their own passwords both on 
      
the max and
    
on machines still connected to the netware network.


 



-----Original Message-----
From: Steveb@tshore.com [mailto:Steveb@tshore.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 April 2006 6:51 AM
To: kane@linkitsoftware.com; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Adding Users via Web Interface

Adam,

What's so hard about pressing <ctrl>+<alt>+<del> and 
      
clicking the button
    
that says "Change Password"?  It seems like opening up a 
      
web browser and
    
doing it at a web server is not only less secure but also 
      
quite a few
    
more steps!

Steve Bostedor
http://www.bozteck.com
Bozteck President

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Kane [mailto:kane@linkitsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:33 PM
To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Adding Users via Web Interface

Hi all,

Is there some kind of application I can install on my Windows 2000
Server IIS machine to allow changing of user passwords via web
interface?  This would be used on a LAN for non-savvy users 
      
(ie. sales
    
associates) to change passwords quickly to users on the win2k server
machine.

Any advice is appreciated.  Thanks!


Regards,

Adam Kane



      

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>