Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: New article on SecurityFocus

Subject: RE: New article on SecurityFocus
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:27:21 -0500
The question is whether the knoppix web server was compromised, or if an
untrustworthy employee just threw it out there.  Are we seeing, or have
seen, any worm-like activity with this vulnerability?  If so, how
rampant is it?  We here in the news that it's all over... Hundreds!....
Thousands!... But yet ask any one to name a site or confirm they have
first hand experience, or have a friend or colleague with fist hand
experience and all you get is them naming one of a handful of sites we
all heard about through media reports.  I'm not saying this isn't a real
threat.  I'm saying I believe it's exploit distribution has been greatly
exaggerated.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Murad Talukdar [mailto:talukdar_m@subway.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 10:20 PM
To: Brady McClenon; 'Drew Simonis'; 'Thor (Hammer of God)'; 
'Erin Carroll'; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Cc: 'Larry Seltzer'; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: New article on SecurityFocus

That was it; SANS
http://handlers.dshield.org/jullrich/wmffaq.html
So it can even get onto 'Trusted' websites.
(At least they are saying they had a 'report').
Digital whispers....


Regards
Murad Talukdar

-----Original Message-----
From: Brady McClenon [mailto:BMcClenon@uamail.albany.edu] 
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:29 AM
To: Drew Simonis; Thor (Hammer of God); Erin Carroll;
pen-test@securityfocus.com
Cc: Larry Seltzer; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: New article on SecurityFocus

Just curious.  I hear media reports and people saying that there's
hundreds or thousands of compromised web site from this, but 
I have ask
where these numbers come from?  Where is this data, or is it pure
speculation?  I'm also curious how one could compromise a web server
with this exploit.  Putting files on a web server to dole out and
compromise other computers I can see, but is the web server really
compromised in this case?  If so, was it by way of the WMF exploit?

One last question:  Has anyone here experienced or know 
anyone that has
a "legitimate" web server compromised (or serving out) by the WMF
exploit.  I'm trying to determine if there are those with actual
knowledge that the sky is indeed falling, or if we are all 
shaking over
unsubstantiated media hype.


-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Simonis [mailto:simonis@myself.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:22 AM
To: Thor (Hammer of God); Erin Carroll; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Cc: Larry Seltzer; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: New article on SecurityFocus


Overall, I think community's coverage of wmf has been delivered 
with an ounce of perception, and a pound of obscurity.  
It's almost 
as if people *want* it to be worse than it is.  I'm not 
surprised, 
of course.  But regardless,  my call is that we'll see a little 
activity here and there, the patch will come out, most 
will install 
it (or have it installed automatically) and the whole issue will 
fade away.  But that's all.

We'll know for sure shortly, either way.


Thor,
I think your path of thought is stuck a bit in the past.  
Worms are neat as a technical exercise, but we see more and 
more that the attackers are increasingly aware of the value 
of these vulnerabilities from a financial perspective, not 
merely for notoriety.  As such, it benefits the attacker to 
have a less subtle attack, one that does not sensationalize 
the vulnerability.  Complacency is their ally.  

That said, there are already numerous (hundreds+) 
"legitimate" web sites that have been compromised and had 
exploit images injected into their content.  There are also 
already hundreds of thousands of machines that have been 
infected with Trojans or bots.  These infected machines will 
patch, but they won't be safe, and the problem gets worse.  

So no, there won't be some catastrophic worm event.  But I 
posit that what there will be could be much worse.  

-- 
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/


--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------



--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: 

Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your 
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, 
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are 
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities 
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! 
Download Trial at:

http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>