Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: sober resurfacing |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:05:49 -0800 (PST) |
That should already be your firewall policy: block everything by default except for that which you explicitly need / permit. That includes outbound connections as well, and not just NTP but everything. [This isn't mandatory, but do realize that not doing so provides less security and is advisable if you want more security.] If you're worried about breaking things, the usual scenario is to set up a "permit but log" rule, and check the log a few days later. Whether or not you decide to block NTP, it's probably a good idea to keep logging NTP traffic and checking the logs periodically for signs of compromise, as long as you have the resources to do so. Having said that, don't assume that if the virus can't make an NTP connection, it won't go ahead and try downloading anyways. Blocking NTP may not block this virus or future variants, depending. The thing to note about these recent Sober articles is that this has been going on for two years now. One Sober.X activation date already came and gone, and dozens of previous variants acted in the same way. This is nothing new, except that the AV companies have released more details this time, and the media is making a bigger deal of it for some reason this time. If you only block the list of URLs given, you'll remain vulnerable when the next Sober variant comes out and the AV companies decide not to publish a list of the URLs. - karl levinson
-----Original Message----- From: Curt Shaffer [mailto:cshaffer@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:50 AM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: sober resurfacing All, I am working on a plan to try and help minimize the
effect of
the possible sober resurfacing on Jan. 5/6th. After reading the
security
focus article that this worm relies on NTP to know when to
release, I am
wondering on the feasibility of blocking NTP out to the internet that
week
except for the certain devices that need it. Does anyone have input
on this? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sober resurfacing, Jason Thompson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MS exchange server 2003 - rpc over https access, sanjiv |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sober resurfacing, Jason Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: MS exchange server 2003 - rpc over https access, Jim Harrison (ISA) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |