Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:20:56 +0000 |
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 11:39 -0800, Jim Harrison (ISA) wrote:
To tell the truth, I'm surprised at the lack of ISA / MS bashing in this thread.
I think it has been quite decent too, although it is the Focus-MS list so you'd expect most of the bashers to just not subscribe.
Is it an indication of MS' place in the general security community, a general lack of interest in ISA or the holiday season approaching? The world may never know...
ISA rocks and as James has said he's a major fan of the system. There is no doubt that ISA is a great system and worth using in a lot of scenarios, I personally love it. Although I know it does have some failings, not to admit that would just be silly as one system can't do everything and do it without flaw - although ISA tries very hard at this and holds together quite well.
Following this context, we then examine the exploits and compromises each firewall product *itself* has experienced; i.e, that attack that succeeded in the context of the firewall code itself. It's in this context where I state that ISA has experienced no reported compromises.
You don't state whether or not that is unique here though although you phrase it as if it is, personally I don't *believe* it is, although I have seen no study on this to prove it either way and haven't undertaken the study myself. By this I mean something properly independent, not vendor funded - which most research in areas like this tends to be.
Also, ISA (and to be fair; the aforementioned competitors) is far more than a simple "firewalling stack". What separates ISA from the others is the fact that ISA has and continues to "lead the pack" in L4+ inspection.
Indeed, easily the strongest selling points of the system. I said it before, nothing comes close to ISA when you want to work with RPC. -- With Regards.. Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue "He who hingeth aboot, geteth hee-haw" Victor - Still Game blog: http://reboot-robot.net sites: http://www.bsrf.org.uk - http://www.security-forums.com ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?, matthew patton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?, James Eaton-Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?, Jim Harrison (ISA) |
| Next by Thread: | RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?, James Eaton-Lee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |