Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?

Subject: RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:20:56 +0000
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 11:39 -0800, Jim Harrison (ISA) wrote:
To tell the truth, I'm surprised at the lack of ISA / MS bashing in this
thread.  

I think it has been quite decent too, although it is the Focus-MS list
so you'd expect most of the bashers to just not subscribe.

Is it an indication of MS' place in the general security
community, a general lack of interest in ISA or the holiday season
approaching?  The world may never know...

ISA rocks and as James has said he's a major fan of the system. There is
no doubt that ISA is a great system and worth using in a lot of
scenarios, I personally love it. Although I know it does have some
failings, not to admit that would just be silly as one system can't do
everything and do it without flaw - although ISA tries very hard at this
and holds together quite well.

Following this context, we then examine the exploits and compromises
each firewall product *itself* has experienced; i.e, that attack that
succeeded in the context of the firewall code itself.
It's in this context where I state that ISA has experienced no reported
compromises.

You don't state whether or not that is unique here though although you
phrase it as if it is, personally I don't *believe* it is, although I
have seen no study on this to prove it either way and haven't undertaken
the study myself. By this I mean something properly independent, not
vendor funded - which most research in areas like this tends to be.

Also, ISA (and to be fair; the aforementioned competitors) is far more
than a simple "firewalling stack".  What separates ISA from the others
is the fact that ISA has and continues to "lead the pack" in L4+
inspection.

Indeed, easily the strongest selling points of the system. I said it
before, nothing comes close to ISA when you want to work with RPC.


-- 
With Regards..
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue

"He who hingeth aboot, geteth hee-haw" Victor - Still Game

blog:  http://reboot-robot.net
sites: http://www.bsrf.org.uk - http://www.security-forums.com
ca:    https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>