Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: security policy 'not specified' option |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:32:11 -0400 |
[ convoluted GP parsing stuff snipped...]
I know this all sounds really convoluted, and trust me, it's a lot easier if it's drawn on a whiteboard, but this is essentially how group policies are processed. There are nuances I didn't touch on such as permissions to read and apply group policy, but this has already gone on long enough. :-)
So technically there's the possibility that privileges may change during the time between logon and whenever XP finishes processing the Group Policy/Security Policy/Wallpaper Policy? Can I ctrl-alt-del and kill whatever process is still parsing the policies? Is loopback processing on by default?
Last- RSoP (which is represented in a somewhat cleaner way as "Group Policy Results" and "Group Policy Planning" in GPMC) has NOTHING to do with how group policy is processed. All RSoP does is simulate the processing of group policy and show you what the end results either *are* based on what happened when user x in location y logged onto computer a in location b (resultant mode in RSoP or "Group Policy Results" in GPMC) or what they *would be* if you put user x in location y and they logged onto computer a in location b (planning mode in RSoP or "Group Policy Planning" in GPMC). RSoP does not change how group policy is actually processed regardless of whether you use it in planning mode or reporting mode. RSoP/GPMC planning/results are merely tools to allow an administrator to build scenarios (planning) or to troubleshoot where specific settings came from "results".
I wasn't implying that RSoP had anything to do with processing although looking again I can see why you'd come to that conclusion. I only meant that whatever the RSoP _happens to be_ gets applied, not that you can change it _using_ RSoP.
Laura P.S. I was asleep until just before I wrote this, so please forgive any typos or lack of clarity. :-)
I'm never really awake until 11am no matter when I get up. Derick
-----Original Message----- From: Derick Anderson [mailto:danderson@vikus.com] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 7:58 AM To: matthew patton; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: security policy 'not specified' option-----Original Message----- From: matthew patton [mailto:pattonme@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:57 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: security policy 'not specified' option Some time back I used a security policy editor that had 3 options: enabled, disabled, and 'unset'. By not setting it either way, the machine inherited the domain settings. Unfortunately the standard system policy editors shipped with 2K/2K3/XP don't appearto have that3rd option which means now I've got all kinds of machinerunning withwho knows what setting and ignoring the domain policy. Andonce you'veselected en/disabled via the radio box, there isn't a wayto unset it.How do I dig myself out of this? I probably can play Registry Magic and accomplish what Ineed but Icould have sworn I had a tool that would let me do what Iused to beable to do. any ideas?I use Microsoft's Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) so I can't verify my recollection on the standard Windows 2003 Group Policy editor, but as I recall, there are usually three options: "enabled", "disabled", and "not defined". When you choose "not defined", the local security policy looks up the Group Policy chain by default (you can change it) in the following order: 1. Enforced Policies from top-level down 2. Local OU GPOs 3. Parent OU GPOs from the bottom-level up 4. Microsoft defaults By default, the Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP) for the domain is applied to the local computer. I don't know if you can turnthis off(and why?) but by default it works. I would advise gettingthe GPMC asit makes the whole Group Policy process easier to understand and implement. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0a6d4 c24-8cbd-4 b35-9272-dd3cbfc81887&DisplayLang=en If you think that the machines aren't getting the group policy (and they are Windows XP/2003-based) you can run gpupdate /forceto applythe domain group policy and then check the event log to seeif therewere any errors. Also you should run netdiag and dcdiag onyour domaincontrollers to make sure things are working happily. As a test, set the Computer Configuration -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies/Security Options ->InteractiveLogon: "Message text for users attempting to log on" tosomething andthen see if your domain computers start displaying the message. Derick Anderson -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #262, Marc Fossi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | New List - Beta-Announce, Marc Fossi |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: security policy 'not specified' option, Laura A. Robinson |
| Next by Thread: | Change Password, Cristian Brolin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |