Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: exploit to vulnerability

Subject: RE: exploit to vulnerability
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:08:35 +1000
You're right Steve when you say;
? But would you not have these boxes that require patching (new builds or
whatever) in a secured environment?  

But can I guarantee that every thing that needs to be filtered
is--especially for a new exploit? I obsess about becoming
complacent-paranoia has become my middle name.

I don't know how likely it would be for something new to jump onto a port
that we have to have open for whatever reason and get in but as I am a one
man show(from writing/enforcing policy to troubleshooting hardware to
purchasing etc etc) when it comes to IT in the office, then it means that
time is always my biggest battle here.
Automation is great but even then, things need monitoring.

I guess my 'what if' was in the realms of unlikely but still...
I take your points about testing though and it makes me think that
convincing the 'powers that be' of having test machines/policies pays in the
long run. Reality is though, that it most likely won't appeal as a priority.


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Manzuik [mailto:smanzuik@eeye.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:53 AM
To: Murad Talukdar
Subject: RE: exploit to vulnerability

-----Original Message-----
From: Murad Talukdar [mailto:talukdar_m@subway.com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:00 PM
To: 'Murad Talukdar'; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: exploit to vulnerability

<snip>

I guess the window, on average, is bigger than I thought, however, the
top end of the exploit bell curve may well mean 0-day(or close enough)
for a few. And as we all know, that one which gets in could be the one
that does enough damage. So I would certainly like to use that scale in
my 'lead time'
rather than say, 'What me worry? I've got (on average) four weeks.'

---------------------------------------------------

But would you not have these boxes that require patching (new builds or
whatever) in a secured environment?  Sure, take an unpatched box and put
it on an unprotected network with zero filtering in place and it will be
ultimately owned and owned quickly but in your specific case, I doubt
this is what is done.



Signed,
Steve Manzuik
eEye Digital Security
T.949-900-4118
C.949-874-4397

http://eEye.com/Blink - End-Point Vulnerability Prevention
http://eEye.com/Retina - Network Security Scanner 
http://eEye.com/Iris - Network Traffic Analyzer 
http://eEye.com/SecureIIS - Stop known and unknown IIS vulnerabilities 

Important Notice: This email is confidential, may be legally privileged,
and is for the intended 
recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance
on any of it by anyone else 
is prohibited and may be a criminal offense.  Please delete if obtained
in error and email confirmation 
to the sender. 



I read my email with Outlook
I read your email with Iris




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>