Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: exploit to vulnerability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:08:35 +1000 |
You're right Steve when you say;
? But would you not have these boxes that require patching (new builds or
whatever) in a secured environment? But can I guarantee that every thing that needs to be filtered is--especially for a new exploit? I obsess about becoming complacent-paranoia has become my middle name. I don't know how likely it would be for something new to jump onto a port that we have to have open for whatever reason and get in but as I am a one man show(from writing/enforcing policy to troubleshooting hardware to purchasing etc etc) when it comes to IT in the office, then it means that time is always my biggest battle here. Automation is great but even then, things need monitoring. I guess my 'what if' was in the realms of unlikely but still... I take your points about testing though and it makes me think that convincing the 'powers that be' of having test machines/policies pays in the long run. Reality is though, that it most likely won't appeal as a priority. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Manzuik [mailto:smanzuik@eeye.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:53 AM To: Murad Talukdar Subject: RE: exploit to vulnerability -----Original Message----- From: Murad Talukdar [mailto:talukdar_m@subway.com] Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:00 PM To: 'Murad Talukdar'; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: exploit to vulnerability <snip> I guess the window, on average, is bigger than I thought, however, the top end of the exploit bell curve may well mean 0-day(or close enough) for a few. And as we all know, that one which gets in could be the one that does enough damage. So I would certainly like to use that scale in my 'lead time' rather than say, 'What me worry? I've got (on average) four weeks.' --------------------------------------------------- But would you not have these boxes that require patching (new builds or whatever) in a secured environment? Sure, take an unpatched box and put it on an unprotected network with zero filtering in place and it will be ultimately owned and owned quickly but in your specific case, I doubt this is what is done. Signed, Steve Manzuik eEye Digital Security T.949-900-4118 C.949-874-4397 http://eEye.com/Blink - End-Point Vulnerability Prevention http://eEye.com/Retina - Network Security Scanner http://eEye.com/Iris - Network Traffic Analyzer http://eEye.com/SecureIIS - Stop known and unknown IIS vulnerabilities Important Notice: This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offense. Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender. I read my email with Outlook I read your email with Iris --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: exploit to vulnerability, Steve Manzuik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: IEEE 802.1x & dynamic vlan assignment, linux . yahoo |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: exploit to vulnerability, Steve Manzuik |
| Next by Thread: | anti-phishing implementation, Bjorn Borg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |