Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed onthem? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:27:27 -0400 |
But what happens when the exploit targets the AV? The situation is reversed. Furthermore, if both companies were running identically then both were doing it wrong. A system integrity checker on either system would have alerted the admin to a potential problem... Apparently neither, (fictional), company used one. Potentially and statistically the integrity checker is less likely to be exploited/able than the AV so if you are going to run any additional software, (thus reducing the system security), an integrity checker is a better bet. -----Original Message----- From: Gareth Humphries [mailto:ghumphries@linz.govt.nz] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:25 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed onthem? Harlan, et al: I think the points most people are making here can be summed in a simple scenario: - 2 companies install webservers - both use identical OS's and IIs versions. Both folow all a dilliegent process of securing the box, such that IIS is the only service running, port 80 is the only port open. They both follow an identical, very thorough process, except that 1 installs AV software, the other doesn't. - An exploit is discovered and disclosed in IIS before MS have a chance to patch. Lets say a buffer overflow in the "content:" tag. Unlikely and simplistic, but quite suitable for our purposes. (the point being, you can't trust 3rd party software) - Some black-hat kiddie finds the exploit code, wraps a stock rootkit up in it, and sends it into the wild. - It hits both of our theortical organisations webservers, and exploits successfully on both of them. - The webserver with AV software detects the rootkit, and cleans the file/notifies the admin/whatever. - What happens to the system without AV software is left as an exercise for the reader (clue: 0wnAg3) Not an unlikely scenario, I'm sure you'll agree. No amount of lock-down can protect you from a vulnerability in the service you are deliberatey exposing - AV software can. Not all the time, granted, but sometimes. And sometimes is a hell of a lot better than never in my books. Gareth Humphries IT Specialist IBM New Zealand Ltd ________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________ This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately (Phone 0800 665 463 or info@linz.govt.nz) and destroy the original message. LINZ accepts no responsibility for changes to this email, or for any attachments, after its transmission from LINZ. Thank you. ________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Joe Marsh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Peter Gutmann data deletion theaory?, Simple Nomad |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Joe Marsh |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed onthem?, Steve Bostedor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |