Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT) |
That's all hind sight, Harlan. Getting people to protect their servers with basic tools like antivirus is far more feasible than trying to turn everyone into exploit clairvoyants! It is a very simple and indisputable fact that antivirus played a major part in saving many very important companies a very large sum of money. Ignoring that is not advisable.
Again, as I stated before, it was a band-aid...and it worked this time. The real issue is that systems are exposed to the Internet all the time w/ poor/no admin passwords, poorly configured services, etc., and it's software such as A/V products that are deemed the heros for picking up the slack. In a nutshell, it's enabling the poor administration behaviour.
It's irresponsible to expose a server to the Internet without antivirus protection on it no matter what its role is.
Perhaps. I happen to not agree with you on that. I believe, however, that it is irresponsible to expose a server to the Internet with no Admin or 'sa' password, or to with unneeded services enabled.
It seems to me that there is an air of arrogance in the thought process that says "I was able to beat it last time, so I have no worries about the future". Many of the companies that lost millions thought that they had all of the bases covered. Contrary to what you're trying to imply, it was not that they were just lazier than you or less "elite".
There was no implication of that nature on my part, nor is there an elitist attitude. The basic configuration steps that I mention have been posted on the MS site as far back as IIS 4.0's time...that fact that they weren't followed is another matter entirely, and one not solved by the installation of A/V software.
Not every company can afford a 24/7 security geek standing at their routers checking the exploits at the door! We can all afford basic antiviral protection, though.
That's a business decision, and one that affects the security process. One doesn't have to "stand at the routers", as you say. All one has to do is understand what traffic needs to pass through the routers, and disable the rest...and to be honest, it's really not as hard as most folks make it out to be. Replicate the rulesets from your routers on your firewalls, and alert there. If you allow traffic in to port 80, redirect it to the public firewall that you've thoughtfully placed in a DMZ/separate segment.
You may be patting yourself on the back because it didn't hit you this time but it was pure luck that it was a patch that you where aware of. Letting your guard down is such an amateur and arrogant mistake.
I haven't let my guard down. I simply take the time to try and understand the nature of the threats, and plan accordingly. I don't see anything amateurish or arrogant in that. Harlan ------------------------------------------ Harlan Carvey, CISSP "Windows Forensics and Incident Recovery" http://www.windows-ir.com http://windowsir.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Brady McClenon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Brady McClenon |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Steve Bostedor |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?, Steve Bostedor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |