Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?

Subject: RE: Should webservers, eg. IIS 6 have anti--virus installed on them?
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:38:37 -0700
"Harlan Carvey" <keydet89@yahoo.com> 07/19/05 8:11 AM >>>

So far, this is has been an interesting discussion,
but beneath it all, I'm seeing what I think is a
disturbing trend.

Antivirus needs to be part of the overall security
plan for all Windows machines - it's just part of
the cost of doing business - the cost of the
software, maintenance, and CPU overhead.

I'm seeing absolutist statements like the one above,
and it bothers me.  

If a web server is just a web server, the content is
served to the client, going outbound...not coming into
the server.  If the purpose of the system is to take
known-good pages (from the owner) and make them
available to the public (over ports 80 and 443), then
what is the point of A/V software?

When this discussion began, I started thinking about if there were any 
scenarios where I would want to run a Windows server without AV software.  
After giving it much thought, I decided that I would not want a conventional 
server (providing a standard TCP/IP service), ever, without AV software.

There is no doubt there have been many security holes in Windows.  Some of them 
have been remotely-exploitable without user intervention (RPC vulnerabilities, 
for example).  Without AV software, I have no chance of catching anything that 
comes into my server through unexpected means.  With AV software, the odds 
improve that I will find the virus or worm around the time it is trying to get 
in.  The odds may not be 100%, especially for a 0-day.  However, I have a slim 
chance that heuristics may catch it.  I will take a slim chance over no chance.

There is one exception that I can think of, and that is if I am running a 
server that communicates with extremely specialized equipment and works over 
unusual (as a relative term) interfaces (i.e. not today's network interfaces 
using TCP/IP or other standard protocols).  I remember a discussion some time 
back (might have been in Full Disclosure) about whether a virus could attack a 
Windows machine through a serial port.  If the only connection I have to the 
outside world is through a serial port or parallel port, and I control the 
connection (for example, if I had a modem attached to said serial port that 
only made outgoing calls), I might consider not having AV software.  It would 
also be more difficult to get automatic updates of the definitions onto said 
machine, so there would be a practicality issue.

And yes, there would still be ways to get a virus onto said machine, but such 
methods would require physical access and could be minimized through other 
mechanisms (turn off AutoPlay for CDs, for example).

Matt



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>