Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Encrypting remote files with EFS |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 10 May 2005 21:20:48 -0500 |
Zack,
---- Bruce K. Marshall - bmarshall@securityps.com Security PS - Kansas City
Yes, I have. They do have the encrypted attribute, and cannot be opened by other users.
-Zack-
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce K. Marshall [mailto:bkmlstsgohere@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:28 PM To: Zack Schiel Cc: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Encrypting remote files with EFS
Zack,
My suspicion would be that the files on the suspect servers are not actually encrypted. The behavior is not consistent with my experience or expectations.
Have you verified that the encrypted attribute is still set on files while on the server?
---- Bruce K. Marshall - bmarshall@securityps.com Security PS - Kansas City
We are in the midst of deploying EFS to protect specific folders on laptop hard drives. We want EFS used only for that purpose-locally; as such, we do not want users to have the ability to encrypt files that are residing on
file servers. According to my understanding of EFS, which seems to be confirmed by the quote below from Windows help, users shouldn't be able to do so unless we specifically enable file server(s) to be trusted for delegation in AD.
"In a domain environment, remote encryption is not enabled by default. To enable encryption for a specific computer, your network administrator can make that computer trusted for delegation. For more information, consult
your network administrator."
However, some of our servers are allowing files to be encrypted and decrypted remotely-and these servers are *not* marked as trusted for delegation in AD. Further, the user that encrypted the file can scoot over to another PC, log in as themselves, and access the file-and we have no CA infrastructure in place; these are locally-generated EFS certificates that do not chain back past the local client machine. The certificate thumbprints in the personal store for the user account on the two PCs do not match, yet they can access the file just the same, while other user accounts cannot.
I'm thoroughly confused by this behavior, and would appreciate any experts chiming in and cluing me in as to why 1) some servers are allowing remote encryption, while others are not, and 2) why locally-generated EFS certs are behaving this way.
Our environment: -Windows 2000 native-mode domain -All DCs are Win2k, file servers are a 2k/2003 mix -Clients are 2000/XP; the OS of the client/server doesn't seem to matter-some 2k3 servers allow remote encryption, some don't, and some 2000 servers allow, while others don't.
Thanks,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers, Murad Talukdar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Encrypting remote files with EFS, Depp, Dennis M. |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Encrypting remote files with EFS, Zack Schiel |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Encrypting remote files with EFS, Zack Schiel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |