Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 03 May 2005 17:31:30 +1000 |
Hi All, We have had arrival of new scanner/printer/copier in office. It uses SMB to scan files to shared folders on our W2003 network. In order for it to work however, I have had to do the following; 1. From Administrative Tools open Domain Controller Security Policy 2. Smile 3. Select \Security Settings\Local Policies\Security Options folder. 4. In the details pane, double-click Microsoft network server: Digitally sign communications (always), and then click Disabled to prevent SMB packet signing from being required. 5. Click OK. 6. In the details pane, double-click Domain member: Digitally encrypt or sign secure channel data (always), and then click Disabled to prevent secure channel signing from being required. 7. Click OK. Before that, the scan would fail to be sent to the server in question. What are the implications of this--given that we do not ostensibly use SMB for anything else. I've heard scare stories of SMB man in the middle attacks and was under the impression that this is what these specific security settings were pertaining to but am not sure. There are other options for the scanning ie ftp/email but neither would work as we cannot get approval for cost of ftp server nor can the email system take the file sizes that are often req'd by scans our users make. I can see there will be advice against having shared user folders etc on DC's too but the big boss wants more from less if you see what I mean. Kind Regards Murad Talukdar --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | RE: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers, Soluk, Kirk |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | RE: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers, Laura A. Robinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |