Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Basic question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:03:59 -0500 |
Roman, An excellent write-up on LM-v2 is "The NTLM Authentication Protocol" http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html It does not cover your Kerberos request. Although technically NT-W2K3 passwords are based on the Unicode character set and can be up to 128 characters long, Pre-W2K user interfaces limits do not allow passwords to exceed the LanMan 16 byte long, which that write-up above shows, is 14 characters. At this moment the source eludes me, but I remember seeing several times not to use longer than 64 character passwords, it may have been something to do with Kerb, or possibly Inter-OS operability. If I find it I will forward the source. I have read several times the same thing with usernames 104 characters limit. "Logon names can be up to 104 characters. However, it isn't practical to use logon names that are longer than 64 characters". And remember it only uses the first 20 characters, which must be unique in the domain/workstation for Pre-W2K compatibility, and dont forget the display name is limited to 64 characters as well. I sure do wish they would give us "real" off switch for Pre-W2K compatibility. As far as "that authenticating to a domain-based machine from a machine outside the domain" If you need to use CHAP or Digest etc. authentication for IIS/IAS or such, then your password would have choose that "option" that says "Store password using reversible encryption" which "is essentially the same as storing plaintext versions of the passwords". It is always best to use something like SSL etc. to communicate from the outside to your domain-based machine to add a layer of protection for your authentication. Regards, ___________________________________________________ Dave Kleiman, CIFI, CISM, CISSP, ISSAP, ISSMP, MCSE www.SecurityBreachResponse.com www.ComputerForensicInvestigations.com -----Original Message----- From: Roman L. Daszczyszak II [mailto:romandas@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 15:57 To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Basic question -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone have a good reference on the differences between LanMan, NTLM, NTLMv2 and Kerberos? Also, is there any restriction on the length of a password used across a network/LAN for authentication? I'm aware in NT/2K/XP/2003 the max length of a password is 127 characters, but am curious if this is still true for network/domain authentication. Lastly, I have heard (and would like confirmation/denial) that authenticating to a domain-based machine from a machine outside the domain causes an otherwise normally encrypted password to be sent cleartext when authenticating with an IIS server. Can anyone point me to references about this? Thank you for any information y'all can provide. Roman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCMLSUszjStpsfjf8RAtNLAJsGmQv5p9B1bk7msxzK0zrDkpcSKgCgxEKl hoC2TjFp71dLF3Regw1c6qA= =vQB2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question on IIS servers and reverse lookup, Matt Ostiguy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Basic question, Depp, Dennis M. |
| Previous by Thread: | Basic question, Roman L. Daszczyszak II |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Basic question, Laura A. Robinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |