Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Domain Controller Best Practice - Thanks! |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:11:39 -0500 |
Although completely off topic, I feel it is necessary to correct the following statement: <quote> Second thing to correct is that a DC does not contain any SAM DB whatsoever. It contains a copy of the Active Directory (NTDS.dit). This is not a SAM DB. <qoute> A DC does have a SAM database that is used in case Active Directory Restore Mode is ever invoked. If you use use the AD Restore Mode password anywhere else, then you are giving away sensitive data. Chris ________________________________________ From: Adam Vaxvick [mailto:avaxvick@sunwaptasolutions.com] Sent: Wed 3/2/2005 5:53 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Domain Controller Best Practice - Thanks! I never reply but in order to stop the misinformation I thought I should say something so someone doesn't accidentally heed the advice given previously in this thread. The first and most important thing is that by making a Windows 2000/2003 server into a DC is that it is automatically becoming a file server that is accessible to every user account in the domain by default. This is perfectly normal and absolutely required. As this guy seems to be blissfully unaware there are 2 very critical default file shares on every DC that need to be available to all authenticated domain users for read access. Namely these 2: \\DCserver\NETLOGON - all logon scripts are stored here that are run when users logon (it's actually a direct mapping to a sub folder in the SYSVOL folder) \\DCserver\SYSVOL - the root folder for both scripts and most importantly of all the group policies for domain that this DC is in, this is also used for GP and script replication between DC's This is why the 'Authenticated users' group has the 'access this computer from the network' security right by default on DC's. Second thing to correct is that a DC does not contain any SAM DB whatsoever. It contains a copy of the Active Directory (NTDS.dit). This is not a SAM DB. I have no problems using a DC as a file server in small to mid size companies that don't have the resources for dedicated DC's or dedicated file servers. Now I would strongly recommend that any user data shared should be on a separate partition from the OS and should only be setup by someone that knows NTFS and share permissions well and can secure them appropriately. -AV MCSE/MCSA 2000, MCSE/MSCA 2003, CCNP -----Original Message----- From: Murtland, Jerry [mailto:MurtlandJ@Grangeinsurance.com] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:00 PM To: 'Sullivan Tim P'; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Domain Controller Best Practice - Thanks! I don't think I've heard anyone say that "you are not creating a real security risk by allowing your DC to also function as a file server". In fact you are. All user authentication is occurring on this system. User ID's and Passwords for your entire organization are stored here in the SAM file. I would consider this a substantial risk to any IT infrastructure. Risk is measured in degrees proportionate to security controls in place. When you allow 'typical' users to access sensitive servers (especially an infrastructure server), you increase the risk of this system being compromised and your network being exploited. Now, you can lower that risk by taking certain measures, it would be up to you to determine what those measures are. However, if it doesn't cost you anything to rebuild your DC and recreate your user base (backup), then the level of risk is also lowered. However, in most cases, time does have a value, and the data contained on a system should also. You also have to look at it from a liability perspective. If the data were compromised, how could it affect our organization? There are four things you can do with the risk that you have assessed: Accept, Reject, Transfer, or Ignore. You really need to evaluate your environment to assess your options. Jerry J. Murtland, CISSP -----Original Message----- From: Sullivan Tim P [mailto:tim.sullivan@nativemode.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:41 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Domain Controller Best Practice - Thanks! Thanks to everyone for replies on the DC configuration. I got a number of good links. I would summarize the dialog and what I found through reading as this: It would be *best practice* to limit the roles a DC has, however you are not creating a real security risk by allowing your DC to also function as a file server. ________________________ Tim Sullivan Nativemode Technologies 623.910.4700 tim@nativemode.com ________________________________ From: Sullivan Tim P [mailto:tim.sullivan@nativemode.com] Sent: Mon 2/21/2005 6:21 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Domain Controller Best Practice I am in need of some supporting documentation relating to Domain Controllers. The situation is this. A medium sized school would like their single DC to also be a file server. This DC would be serving about 300 people, along with another file server and an email server. My initial recommendation is multiple domain controllers for the simple reason of fault tolerance of the schema. They buy this. However, they would like to see technical documentation saying that it is not a good idea to have a domain controller share roles as a DC and a file server. One of my main concerns, aside from load, is that high school age kids are using the network. They like to poke and prod. I would rather them not even poke at the DC. Also, as the DC has no local security database, you can no longer use permission assignment best practice. To me it just seems like a bad idea, but I need documentation to back it up. Can anyone offer resources to illustrate this? I am scouring technet and the MS AD deployment docs now. Thanks, Tim ______________________ Tim Sullivan Nativemode Technologies (623) 910-4700 tim@nativemode.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Disabling USB mass storage, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Prohibit Folder Compression, Chris Costantino |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Domain Controller Best Practice - Thanks!, Adam Vaxvick |
| Next by Thread: | Microsoft Network Analyzer?, Charlie Saliba |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |