Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Microsoft
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RESPONSE: Users "bypassing" Group Policy restrictions

Subject: Re: RESPONSE: Users "bypassing" Group Policy restrictions
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:49:21 +0100
On 2005-01-28 Miroslaw Slawek Chorazy wrote:
'fraid not. Local administrators can take ownership of any file, and
any registry key. The owner of a file/reg key can change its
permissions. Always. No matter what. 

But because the scenario Edward describes is an Active Directory
Domain then he has additional tools at his disposal...

There exists a policy setting in \Computer Configuration\Windows
Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\User Rights Assignment\ This
security setting determines which users can take ownership of any
securable object in the system, including Active Directory objects,
files and folders, printers, registry keys, processes, and threads.

What if he removes local 'Administrators' group from having this right
and adds 'Domain Administrators' group (of which he is hopefully a
member) and then if he further applies permissions to the registry key
which applies to the above policy and removes the local administrator
and substitutes it for "domain administrators" then in theory it
should work Ricardo is suggesting?

AFAICS they could easily re-assign the "Take Ownership" privilege to
themselves, so this doesn't look like a solution to me. Plus, the
purpose of local administrators is the administration of the local
machine. That's why they *have* the privilege to take the ownership of
each file/object. Instead of revoking the privilege you should actually
ask yourself whether the members of the local administrators group
really need to be members of that group.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
-- 
"Those who would give up liberty for a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety, and will lose both."
--Benjamin Franklin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>