Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: IIS6 on W2k3 DCs |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:27:42 -0500 |
I want to interject something here that is very important. You dont just have to worry about threats from the internet, but from workstations. If your workstations are running with user=local admin, fine - thats a big issue, but even bigger is the code they can get installed on their machines that can now try to influence your DC. It all comes back to keeping that puppy clear and clean. Now - I agree with you about best practices not applying to everyone in every situation, but having said that, there are some "best practices" that if met minimize risk, and the path you take, wont minimize it in the same way. -----Original Message----- From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] [mailto:sbradcpa@pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:12 PM To: Joe Blatz Cc: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: IIS6 on W2k3 DCs I may be laughed from here to kingdom come on this listserve...but I gotta ask.... Common best practices for whom? Define a role please? What is "common best practices" may not be good enough for one person, but may be just fine for another. What are they doing with this box? Exposing it to the web as a web server...yeah I'd still argue that's insanity. But Small Business Server 2003 runs with IIS on our domain controller. Where's MY security risks these days? Not my server..nope......it's my desktops where my security risks lie. Port 80 is closed on my server but IIS is still on there. On the outside is Firewall, intrusion detection and what not. Running with XP sp2 firewalls on the inside but still need to get to more use of user mode on the desktop. Am "I" freaking out over IIS on my domain controller? Nope. Not at this moment. Am I freaking out over admin rights on desktops? You betcha I am... big time. www.threatcode.com Susan...the wacko SBSer. Joe Blatz wrote:
The security guides published by many sources (NSA, MS, etc) stated that IIS4 and IIS5 do not belong on DCs. Common best practices would, in general, guide that an HTTP (IIS or otherwise) daemon doesn't belong on DC. By referring to numerous security guides written specifically for NT4 and W2k we were able to convince a customer of this. Now that IIS6 has come out, and the customer feels that IIS6 is much safer than IIS4 and IIS5, they want to put it back on their DCs. I am looking for sources that document that this is a bad idea. When it comes to the NSA they don't have a guide for W2k3 but have instead pointed to Microsoft's "Windows Server 2003 Security Guide" and the use of the "High Security" settings and templates. The MS guide does (rather subtly) show that IIS should not be on a DC. They only show the HTTP service enabled on an IIS server, but I think this may not be direct enough for our client. Any help finding an explicit statement that IIS6 does not be belong on a DC would be greatly appreciated. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: local admin vs group policy and apps..., Benjamin D. Goldman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PGP and Outlook, Nathaniel Hall |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: IIS6 on W2k3 DCs, Soluk, Kirk |
| Next by Thread: | RE: IIS6 on W2k3 DCs, Sullivan Tim P |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |