Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Subdomain security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:31:44 -0500 |
I hear what you're saying Wim, but as soon as someone tells me that they require a highly secure domain in addition to a domain they already have the place I start is with a new Forest. Once you get into asking some questions about the requirements and what they are really looking to get out of this new domain then you may be able to move to a more secured single forest design.
From the sounds of the initial post in this thread there is a new domain
that is going to be brought up in an un-trusted network. That statement right there throws up flags for me: if the network isn't trusted then neither are the users/admins and I don't want them in my production forest. Oren also mentions that he is looking for a way to block the enterprise admins from having access to this new and un-trusted domain. That statement leads me to believe that the people running this new domain will be getting far more than just some delegated rights, which is why I pointed out that with Domain Admin rights a user can get themselves Enterprise Admin privlidges very easily. The scenario you layed out is definitely a good way to go, but it certainly won't fit with many places. If you have a centralized administration model and you don't care about users in the other domain being able to see objects throughout the forest then that model makes a lot of sense. In the scenario that Oren layed out, from the basic information he provided I still think that a separate forest is required to keep your production environment safe. If the network the new domain was going to be in was a trusted network then that would change the landscape dramatically and your advice would certainly be on the right track. Phil -----Original Message----- From: Wim_Remes@msp.be [mailto:Wim_Remes@msp.be] Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 4:45 PM To: Renouf, Phil Cc: Scott Mulcahy; focus-ms@securityfocus.com; oren@held.org.il Subject: RE: Subdomain security Hi, First, you were correct when saying that the only true security boundary is the forest...but I'm always looking on what I'm trying to secure. There are a few reasons to implement seperate forests, there's a million others for making extensive use of delegation of authority. In my opinion there should only be one single ID that has 'enterprise admin' rights and that should be unknown to any normal admin. It should be only used when a change to the root domain is required and approved through change management. 99% of all daily admin tasks can be performed without domain admin rights, you can allow anything to a simple user by using delegation of authority (and he won't be able to make himself enterprise admin). with proper ID Management and procedures implemented, you would have a dream of a domain, not compromising security on any level. Changes to the group membership can be ruled out by using a 'restricted groups' policy on the domain level. there's lots of info about restricted groups around, I'm posting the jsiinc.com link cuz JSI has loads of other information (both security-related and general) that can help you out on many isssues. Regards, Wim Remes MCSE:Security -----"Renouf, Phil" <Phil.Renouf@tdsecurities.com> wrote: ----- To: "Scott Mulcahy" <scottcm-secfocus@hotmail.com>, <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> From: "Renouf, Phil" <Phil.Renouf@tdsecurities.com> Date: 17/12/2004 19h13 cc: <oren@held.org.il> Subject: RE: Subdomain security
I'm fairly certain that an enterprise admin can get admin privs
anywhere in the forest. Not to mention that as a Domain Admin it is very easy for someone to get themselves enterprise admin rights. One important thing to monitor is changes to the group membership of the major admin groups (Enterprise, Schema, Domain etc.). I know that MOM does this pretty well, but I am sure other monitoring tools offer that as an option. Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | KB824145 with SUS, Hiro Mizutani |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Securty Audit Correlating, Jose Costa |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Subdomain security, Wim_Remes |
| Next by Thread: | Securty Audit Correlating, Jose Costa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |