Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Remote connections |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:42:51 -0700 |
Just as a follow up. If you are using ICA which is encrypted with two piece authentication like RSA that works as well. Then you don't have the VPN Tunnel overhead! -----Original Message----- From: Matt Ostiguy [mailto:ostiguy@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 8:26 AM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Remote connections On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:54:37 -0700, GuidoZ <uberguidoz@gmail.com> wrote:
Why not? I don't know of any current exploit for RDP set to high encryption, and even if there were any, connections may very well be shielded by encrypted tunnels.I'm not aware of any currently either, but as their track record proves, that's meaningless. It was more of a retorical question and a snide remark - please excuse it.
Thor@hammerofgod was working on a brute forcer for term serv/RDP stuff. Haven't checked on it in awhile, but he recommended implementing a standard login banner to slow it down, and password lockouts, both of which are very very good ideas in general. I haven't fully tested tightvnc, but another appeal of RDP/TS (beyond its speed advantage, provided you connect with 256 color as opposed to high bit depth) is with proper audit logging set up, you can generate the following: 10/13/2004 3:23:24 PM 683 8 Success Audit event 2 Security USERNAMEHERE|DOMAINNAMEHERE|(0x0,0xAAAAAA)|Unknown|CLIENTPCNAMEHERE|a.b.c.d SERVERNAMEHERE Session disconnected from winstation: User Name: USERNAMEHERE Domain: DOMAINNAMEHERE Logon ID: (0x0,0xAAAAAA) Session Name: Unknown Client Name: CLIENTPCNAMEHERE Client Address: a.b.c.d 10/13/2004 4:34:55 PM 682 8 Success Audit event 2 Security USERNAMEHERE|DOMAINNAMEHERE|(0x0,0xAAAAA)|RDP-Tcp#4|CLIENTPCNAMEHERE|a.b.c.d SERVERNAMEHERE Session reconnected to winstation: User Name: USERNAMEHERE Domain: DOMAINNAMEHERE Logon ID: (0x0,0xAAAAA) Session Name: RDP-Tcp#4 Client Name: CLIENTPCNAMEHERE Client Address: a.b.c.d That is from win2k, pulled with logparser. Having full audit functionality in the native logging facilities is nice. That all said, vnc vs rdp vs whathaveyou - a good starting assumption is that everything should only be accessible via the vpn, if at all. If it should be accessible through firewall without vpn, they ought to be a stunning reason for it. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly and permanently delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Remote connections, Laura Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interesting thing about ICF and SP2, Thor |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: Remote connections, John Fleming |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Re: Remote connections, Erick Waldchen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |