Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:44:11 -0700 |
Who doesn't have a border firewall? commonly its router - firewall - switch. So you propose to do address filtering on your host based firewall ?. I suggest rethinking this strategy as IP Address range blocking should be done at the border router or firewall long before any Network Translations are done or any traffic traverses the local network. I can imagine a plethora of ways to get around host based IP restrictions, can't get to server1, take over another machine on internal network, then get to server1 and likewise. Running a host based firewall will not allow an extra layer of security if its doing the same thing the border router/firewall is doing. In order to browse the internet from the server you will have to add a lot of sites to the trusted sites list, and once a site is considered trusted it's all over anyway. -----Original Message----- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:deppdm@ornl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:18 AM To: Eric McCarty; larobins@bellatlantic.net; Joe Doyle; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 Eric, A firewall will not only block services, but it will also selectively allow services. For example, I might need to run a web server, but I only want users from a buisness partner to access this site. I can use the firewall to limit access to a specific IP address or subnet. In this case, a host based firewall can add another layer of security to a system. I do agree that you should not be browsing the internet from a server. However, some people will continue to browse the internet from servers. The enhancements to IE6 with W2K3 will not affect you or I, but they will affect many others. Dennis
-----Original Message----- From: Eric McCarty [mailto:eric@lawmpd.com] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:26 PM To: Depp, Dennis M.; larobins@bellatlantic.net; Joe Doyle; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 I think this is a contradiction. On a server, you should turn off all services you have no intention of having clients connect to, not setup
a firewall to block them. Next you should not be browsing the internet
using your server, and if you noticed, the enhanced browser security prevents this for the most part anyway. Eric -----Original Message----- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:deppdm@ornl.gov] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:27 AM To: larobins@bellatlantic.net; Joe Doyle; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 WRT Windows firewall and IE updates. Dennis-----Original Message----- From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:larobins@bellatlantic.net] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 2:38 AM To: 'Joe Doyle'; focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 In what respects? Laura-----Original Message----- From: Joe Doyle [mailto:joe.doyle@promega.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 5:38 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 Not yet. Windows 2003 Service Pack 1 is supposed tobring it up tospeed with Windows XP SP2. Joe -----Original Message----- From: James Bowman [mailto:jim@drexel.edu] Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 9:11 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 Is their a set of hotfixes needed for 2003 that make itcomprable infeatures / overall security posture to XP SP2? Although there's probably a bevy of XP SP2 items embeddedin 2003, Iwould imagine there's a bunch that's not... Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Eric McCarty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Depp, Dennis M. |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Eric McCarty |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Thor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |