Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:14:49 -0400 |
Interesting comment. The arbitrary code exploits you mentioned, are these unique to SP2 or does SP1 fall prey to them as well. I am not aware of any exploits that are unique to SP2. The firewall is not perfect I will admit, but it is a vast improvement over its predecdessor. The current firewall is great for a home machine. However, when you use the wizard to poke holes in the firewall, they seem to be much larger than needed. I think a better analogy for the firewall is a privacy fence, but when you use the wizard to open the firewall, often you are removing several boards when a knot hole would have worked just as well. Denny
-----Original Message----- From: kyle [mailto:kyle@inetconnection.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9:53 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003 Well, on the grand scheme of things, XP SP2 is far from secure. I know of a good many arbitrary code exploits that are easily utilized by a common webmaster. And the "firewall" is like a chain link fence for a privacy fence. IMO you were better off not "upgrading" to SP2 and sticking with SP1 until SP2 was fixed (released, but far from done, and def. not an upgrade) I'm sure M$ was better with 2003 considering it was supposed to be a SERVER edition, but then again you never know with M$. On Sunday 19 September 2004 09:11 pm, James Bowman wrote:Is their a set of hotfixes needed for 2003 that make it comprable in features / overall security posture to XP SP2? Although there's probably a bevy of XP SP2 items embeddedin 2003, I wouldimagine there's a bunch that's not... Thanks-------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Are MS Powerpoint's vulnerable to this JPEG Vuln?, Jeff Fedor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Whittlesey, Steve |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, Laura A. Robinson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Items within XP SP2 and Win2003, kyle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |