Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web portal |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:26:35 -0500 |
Glad you mentioned Solaris Mario. I was holding back since this is a linux list. But i agree.. if Linux is not a must.. i would strongly recommend solaris 10 on a nice AMD opteron box. And if you went that direction.. go with a multi-cpu and/or multi-core and configure Solaris zones to isolate the different applications running on the server. Or at least two zones.. your main global zone.. and a zone for all applications.. Mario A. Spinthiras wrote:
If linux was a must then I would personally use Debian. It comes ready with some HA support from the linux-ha project. If you can have a flexible choice id say solaris without second thought. Mario. A. Spinthiras -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Ronald MacDonald Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:08 PM To: Mohammad Halawah Cc: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web portal Hi Mohammad, Not meaning to turn this into a "my distro's better than yours" thread, but for stability and security, I'd recommend having a serious look at Debian. It's easily stripped down to its most essential components for a nice small footprint and is easy to keep up to date with the apt system. As for performance, I suppose every implementation of a distro varies, but I'd it's is pretty adequate. In terms of hardening the OS, there's obviously a few ways to go about it. The most foolproof way is just "don't do anything stupid" - don't run any services you don't need, don't bother with gimmicky applications, just leave it all at the bare minimum. Also, there's a lot of good reading out there (more so with linux) as regards to hardening the OS. Incidentally, Bastille springs to mind - it's a good starting point to hardening your system. Regards, Ronald.
-- Corey A. Johnson Creative Network Innovations http://www.cniweb.net/ 1-800-264-5547 ** 1-321-259-1984
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | AW: Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web p ortal, Gruber Christoph |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Red Hat vs Debian Linux: overall security, tubbs |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web portal, Mario A. Spinthiras |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web portal, Razvan Cosma |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |