Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:43:41 -0800 |
In message <9555a4b00611080922u79c38d7dl8a7132cb7f299ec2@mail.gmail.com>, "Seba stiaan Veenstra" writes:
Hi, I didn't read the whole discussion about this issue but I came up with an idea which might be usefull to detect brute force attempt. By storing the passwords a certain user has used in the past along with the current password you could be able to compare to password (by pattern matching) used at the login attempts with the passwords list. If the password used differs significantly (this excludes typos) from the entries in the password list, there could be a possible brute force attempt. The reason for storing the previous passwords is that people tend to use every password they've used in the past when they forgot their password. Maybe this idea can be used along with the other methods of detecting brute force attempts. Anyway, it's just a random thought.
In many jurisdictions this would be an invasion of privacy and against the law. Not only that but a security exposure too. For example, people tend to use similar passwords, even the same passwords for various applications and machines. Once a sysadmin knows someone's password the victim could be impersonated without detection. Whereas su commands, access to Oracle databases, and other services the sysadmin would not normally have access to would require work on the part of the sysadmin to gain entry into and these attempts would surely be logged and hopefully detected. Logging people's passwords is a bad idea. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Web: http://www.komquats.com and http://www.bcbodybuilder.com FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org BC Government: <Cy.Schubert@gov.bc.ca> "Lift long enough and I believe arrogance is replaced by humility and fear by courage and selfishness by generosity and rudeness by compassion and caring." -- Dave Draper
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks, fabio |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks, Christian Jonassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks, Greg Metcalfe |
| Next by Thread: | spambots and dictionary attacks, rowland onobrauche |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |