Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Linux
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Samba vs NFS

Subject: Re: Samba vs NFS
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:03:58 -0600
I can't speak to the technical details quite yet, but Novell / SUSE LINUX NSS offers substantial granularity and access controls, as well as significant data center scalability advantages. Netware users have long loved the security and access control features of NSS. Of course the fat lady hasn't sung quite yet. As the first production release is said to ship on March 1st. Although our limited experience during the BETAs so far was quite positive. What are folks thoughts. Has anyone given NSS a serious look?

At 2/22/2005 04:57 PM, Raul Dias wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:07 -0800, Avery Payne wrote:
>
>> NFS is becoming "long in the tooth" and there are replacements that are
>> being proposed, but none have gained as much widespread traction as
>> NFS.  Look up AFS (and its cousin, OpenAFS), SFS, and the terms "network
>> filesystem" or "distributed filesystem" in Google.  AFS has also been
>> around but uses Kerberos authentication, SFS takes NFS further with
>> encryption and vastly-stronger user validation.
>
>So,
>
>What is suggested in a Linux to Linux environment to replace NFS?
>
>AFAIK, NFS is only good if you (the admin) have total control over the
>clients (root access and user accounts always map to the same uid like
>LDAP, NIS).
>
>OTOH, if other people (you don't trust) have root access or uids are not
>map the sameway everywhere, NFS security is gone.
>
>So, what other FS address this problems in Linux? Good authentication,
>criptography if desired but not mandatory (some times it can slow down
>the system), and most important stability.
>
>A few years ago I search for a replacement of NSF (v3) and found nothing
>good enough on Linux.  Most solutions were on slow development and had
>bad stability.
>
>NFS v4 seems to address this problems but it is not close to be ready
>(AFAIK).  RedHat seems to have some closed source fs solution (GFS i
>think).
>
>I even thought already about using a SAMBA to SAMBA Linux solution to
>address parts of this problems.
>
>
>
>So, what is there for real today?
>
>
>Raul Dias


-- Gregory D. Rosenberg N9NNO RICIS, Inc. +1 866-RICIS-77 Toll Free Voice (US) Chief Technology Officer +1 708-444-2690 Voice (International) gregg@ricis.com +1 866-99-RICIS Toll Free Fax (US) www.ricis.com - +1 708-444-2697 Fax (International)

Novell Platinum / ISV partner
SUSE LINUX Premium business, technology, education, and support partner

My PGP Public Key can be found at www.greggrosenberg.com/pgp-key.htm

"The mind works a lot like a parachute, it works best when it is open."

This email and any attachments that are included in it have been scanned for malicious or inappropriate content and are believed to be safe.







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>