Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Samba vs NFS |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:13:49 +1300 |
http://lufs.sourceforge.net/lufs/
i'd favour openafs over nfs, but i'm not so fond of either.
Raul Dias wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:07 -0800, Avery Payne wrote:
NFS is becoming "long in the tooth" and there are replacements that are being proposed, but none have gained as much widespread traction as NFS. Look up AFS (and its cousin, OpenAFS), SFS, and the terms "network filesystem" or "distributed filesystem" in Google. AFS has also been around but uses Kerberos authentication, SFS takes NFS further with encryption and vastly-stronger user validation.
So,
What is suggested in a Linux to Linux environment to replace NFS?
AFAIK, NFS is only good if you (the admin) have total control over the clients (root access and user accounts always map to the same uid like LDAP, NIS).
OTOH, if other people (you don't trust) have root access or uids are not map the sameway everywhere, NFS security is gone.
So, what other FS address this problems in Linux? Good authentication, criptography if desired but not mandatory (some times it can slow down the system), and most important stability.
A few years ago I search for a replacement of NSF (v3) and found nothing
good enough on Linux. Most solutions were on slow development and had
bad stability.
NFS v4 seems to address this problems but it is not close to be ready (AFAIK). RedHat seems to have some closed source fs solution (GFS i think).
I even thought already about using a SAMBA to SAMBA Linux solution to address parts of this problems.
So, what is there for real today?
Raul Dias
-- Cheers, Andrew Horton Corbis Digital Printing Ltd <http://www.corbis.co.nz>
Corbis Digital Printing Ltd
21 Opawa Rd, Opawa
P.O. Box 10337, ChCh
Phone : 03 3776644
Fax : 03 9822036
Cell : 0274 646959
Email : andrew@corbis.co.nz <mailto:andrew@corbis.co.nz>
Web : http://www.corbis.co.nz
Thank you for choosing Corbis
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Samba vs NFS, Frank Burkhardt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Samba vs NFS, Raul Dias |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Samba vs NFS, Raul Dias |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Samba vs NFS, Raul Dias |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |