Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-Linux
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Samba vs NFS

Subject: Re: Samba vs NFS
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:13:49 +1300
in a linux to linux environment you might consider LUFS which lets u mount files systems via ssh

LUFS is enabling you to mount into your file hierarchy a remote computer's file system, which is accessible by various means (ftp, ssh, etc.). Then, the access to the remote files will be completely network transparent. In other words, you'll be able to read/modify remote files as if they were local, watch movies/listen to MP3s from FTP/SSH/Gnutella servers *without* copying them locally. Sheer magic. Now skip to the next section.


http://lufs.sourceforge.net/lufs/

i'd favour openafs over nfs, but i'm not so fond of either.

Raul Dias wrote:

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:07 -0800, Avery Payne wrote:



NFS is becoming "long in the tooth" and there are replacements that are being proposed, but none have gained as much widespread traction as NFS. Look up AFS (and its cousin, OpenAFS), SFS, and the terms "network filesystem" or "distributed filesystem" in Google. AFS has also been around but uses Kerberos authentication, SFS takes NFS further with encryption and vastly-stronger user validation.



So,

What is suggested in a Linux to Linux environment to replace NFS?

AFAIK, NFS is only good if you (the admin) have total control over the
clients (root access and user accounts always map to the same uid like
LDAP, NIS).

OTOH, if other people (you don't trust) have root access or uids are not
map the sameway everywhere, NFS security is gone.

So, what other FS address this problems in Linux? Good authentication,
criptography if desired but not mandatory (some times it can slow down
the system), and most important stability.

A few years ago I search for a replacement of NSF (v3) and found nothing
good enough on Linux. Most solutions were on slow development and had
bad stability.


NFS v4 seems to address this problems but it is not close to be ready
(AFAIK).  RedHat seems to have some closed source fs solution (GFS i
think).

I even thought already about using a SAMBA to SAMBA Linux solution to
address parts of this problems.



So, what is there for real today?


Raul Dias






--
Cheers,
Andrew Horton
Corbis Digital Printing Ltd <http://www.corbis.co.nz>

        
        Corbis Digital Printing Ltd
21 Opawa Rd, Opawa
P.O. Box 10337, ChCh
Phone : 03  3776644
Fax : 03  9822036
Cell  : 0274 646959
Email : andrew@corbis.co.nz <mailto:andrew@corbis.co.nz>
Web   : http://www.corbis.co.nz


Thank you for choosing Corbis

This e-mail message and attachments are confidential to Corbis Digital Printing Limited and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately and destroy the message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is prohibited.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>