We have quite a few colocated servers and were in the same possition
as you. However, i did manage to test out and put together an upgrade
using yum to move to CentOS ( www.centos.org ), which is RHEL, minus
the RH. I've since successfully migrated all of my legacy redhat OS's
using the method I provided here:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=276534
There are also a couple other RHEL rebuilds that I am aware of:
www.taolinux.org
www.whiteboxlinux.org ( might be .com ? ) <- Single developer, little
to no community support
As far as i know this method can not be used to upgrade to RHEL
itself. It may be possible if you build your own local yum repository,
but i've not tried and know of nobody that has.
As we do not require support from redhat we're very comfortable with
our decision.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 03:27:03 -0400, Chuq Yang <chuq@bigfoot.com> wrote:
you may want to look into yum (YellowDog Updater, Modified) at
http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum. There is a list of mirrors there that
you can use in lieu of fedoralegacy. I'm not quite sure if the repositories
will still keep updating RH9 though.
Chuq
----- Original Message -----
From: "Monty Ree" <chulmin2@hotmail.com>
To: <focus-linux@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:21 AM
Subject: redhat patch problem?
Hello, all.
As you know, Redhat 9.0 and below patch is ended at April 30, 2004.
But I think that I have no problem because of fedoralegacy
(http://www.fedoralegacy.org/)
But, I guess that fedoralegacy doesn't any patch any more after
June,right?
So is there any other method or any project which can maintain patch of
the
redhat series?
Thanks in advance.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messengerë íí ìëììì ìë ìêì ëíë
ëëìì.
http://messenger.msn.co.kr
--
Beau Henderson
JustManaged.com - Affordable Linux Administration & Security Services.
