Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Recommended IPS signature set |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:12:25 -0800 |
Most of the 'Out-of-box' configurations are such that their device performs better. So they would disable the signatures which would affect the performance. You would observe that most of the signatures where pattern matching is involved per packet (independent of the flow, or specific port number) would always be disabled. Other reason for disabling non critical signatures is that some of the devices have limit on number of patterns that can be loaded in the fast memory, without the need of swapping out. Thus they try to limit the number of patterns by tuning the number of signatures. Some of the signatures are disabled because of high rate of false positives. Although none of the products would say the above, that is the primary reason. Any ways it is better to tune the IDS/IPS device as per individual environment so as to get maximum performance and less false positives. Regards, Yashodhan -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Ravi Chunduru Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:17 AM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Recommended IPS signature set i understand from several emails in this list is that UTM or IPS devices enable only subset of signatures for detection as well as blocking - it is being termed as 'sane IPS', 'out-of-box IPS' , recommended etc.. is there any criteria (standard or non-standard) used in categorizing signature as 'recommended'? is it based on CVE priority? Thanks Ravi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig n=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: login attempt admin/password, Seth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: login attempt admin/password, Ron Gula |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Recommended IPS signature set, Jeremy Bennett |
| Next by Thread: | SSL - Man-in-the-Middle filtering, Ravi Chunduru |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |