Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Asymmetric traffic/topology

Subject: RE: Asymmetric traffic/topology
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:43:31 -0800

Based on the feedback which we got from our customers on security products,
it appears that this is not un-common, especially in SME deployments. We
don't see this issue if security devices are deployed at the edge though.
When deployment happens in the core of Enterprise networks, these scenarios
are observed.

Stateful security devices fail in these cases as they don't see all packets
of session and due to this they may even drop packets. For example, stateful
security device drops SYN+ACK packet if it did not see SYN packet before. 

Due to customer demand, we had to add 'Bypass security processing'
functionality to bypass packets on configured networks to satisfy these
deployments. Of course the default behavior does not bypass any security
processing.

Srini


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On
Behalf Of snort user
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:42 PM
To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Subject: Asymmetric traffic/topology

Greetings.

I am sure that most of you know about the asymmetric traffic/topology
problem in relevance to
IDS/IPS systems.
( By Asymmetric traffic/topology, I mean the case where client to
server packets traverse a different path
in your network compared to server to client packets. Hence the
IDS/IPS see only one side of the conversation)

I am trying to find out how wide this problem really is?
Is it commonly seen in large / enterprise networks ?

Any input is welcome.

Thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=in
tro_sfw 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


********************************************************************************
This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any 
unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, 
please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of 
the original message. 
Thank you.
 
Intoto Inc. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to 
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>