Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Re: HTTP traffic |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2 Aug 2007 05:46:53 -0000 |
Yes, specially client-side based rules. It's always better to be bit exploit specific. On the server side, chances are less if you write vulnerability specific, or some tactics to prevent false positive. As abhi specified about the ms dos device name vulnerability, if we block just "com" will trigger FP for requests like "3com" , ".com", "common" etc. So you need to *think* how-to counter it, may be look for a space after 'com' or check no bytes follows after 'com', also keeping in mind various evasions tactics. HTH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: port mirroring for two targets, Matt Percival |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: port mirroring for two targets, Paul Halliday |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: port mirroring for two targets, Matt Percival |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: HTTP traffic, abhicc285 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |