Hi,
Could you anybody know signature for Msword 0-day attack vulnerbility for snort.
Thanks,
Regards,
Muruganandam
-----Original Message-----
From: Omar A. Herrera [mailto:omar.herrera@oissg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:37 PM
To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Snort false positive[Scanned]
Hi,
These false positives are common in internal networks if no tuning has been
done.
The Readme.sfportscan file within the doc/ directory of the snort
distribution contains information on how to interpret these results and how
to fine tune this module.
Regards,
Omar Herrera
-----Original Message-----
From: Isidro Catalán Ramos
Hi list,
We have Snort 2.4.4 and in the logs appear a lot of Port Scan traffic of
this type:
(portscan) TCP Portsweep
(portscan) ICMP Sweep
(portscan) UDP Portsweep
(portscan) Open Port
And the payload of this alerts is like the above:
Payload (ASCII):
Priority Count: 5.Co
nnection Count: 4.IP
Count: 14.Scanned I
P Range: 192.168.1.9
:65.54.171.28.Port/
Proto Count: 8.Port/
Proto Range: 80:3410
.
This alerts come from a lot of our network computers but they seems to
be clean of spyware, worms, etc...
We need to know if this is a false posivite or we have a problem in our
LAN.
Tanks!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
