Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Juniper and ISS Protocol Anomaly Detection Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 15 May 2006 12:01:19 -0400 |
Mike, We have already compared these two solutions in depth and ended up choosing Juniper. We already use NetScreens as our firewall solution and Juniper will be offering an IDP module for the NetScreens very shortly which will incorporate the IDP management within their pre-existing NSM console package. Personally, I found ISS' management console much more intuitive, but I felt that their tech support was severely lacking. Their support team just never seemed interested in giving us any help. -Wayne ________________________________________ Wayne D Reynolds Network Engineering and Security Conde Nast Publications mailto:wayne_reynolds@condenast.com -----Original Message----- From: Mike Youngs [mailto:myoungs@glenergy.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:06 AM To: focus-ids@lists.securityfocus.com Subject: Juniper and ISS Protocol Anomaly Detection Evaluation Hello Everyone, I am doing a network based intrusion detection and prevention system evaluation, and have come across something I would like this groups collective experience to give an opinion on. For various reasons, we have settled on making a selection between the Juniper IDP 600C and the ISS Proventia GX5008. During our evaluation, we have found that Juniper and ISS offer their protocol anomaly detection means in much different ways. What I would like to hear from this group is your experience and insight with either product's protocol anomaly detection. If someone has insight and/or experience with both products, that will be that much better. I hope to find out if each vendor's protocol anomaly detection features are essentially the same thing, or if one is superior over the other and why, so I can make a more informed decision on this feature. Another way to say it is, does "protocol anomaly detection" mean the same thing to both vendors? It appears that "attack pattern" means something different to each vendor. One considers in the actual string or pattern to look for in a packet, and the other considers is it multiple events when viewed as a whole could mean an attack on a system. Any insight would be appreciated! Thanks in advance, Mike Youngs Network Manager Great Lakes Energy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Methods to Log snort alerts in XML, M Askar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Methods to Log snort alerts in XML, sendsec |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: Juniper and ISS Protocol Anomaly Detection Evaluation, Security Focus |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Juniper and ISS Protocol Anomaly Detection Evaluation, Compton, Rich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |